Patient, client, consumer, survivor or other alternatives? A scoping review of preferred terms for labelling individuals who access healthcare across settings

Abstract

ObjectivesUse of the term ‘patient’ has been recently debated, compared with alternatives including ‘consumer’ and ‘client’. This scoping study aimed to provide an integrated view of preferred labels across healthcare contexts and countries to clarify labelling preferences of individuals accessing healthcare.DesignScoping study.Data sourcesA preliminary literature search using GoogleScholar, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO found 43 key papers discussing terminology for labelling individuals accessing healthcare services. We then used citation chaining with PubMed and GoogleScholar to identify studies discussing term preferences among healthcare recipients.Eligibility criteriaNo date limits were applied, and all healthcare settings were considered. Primary research studies examining terminology preferences of individuals accessing healthcare, published in peer-reviewed journals were eligible.Data extraction and synthesisAll authors extracted data regarding preferred term and study characteristics, and assessed reporting quality of the studies using criteria relevant to our design.ResultsWe identified 1565 articles, of which 47 met inclusion criteria. Six articles that examined preference for personal address (eg, first name) were excluded. Of the remaining 41 studies, 33 examined generic terms (‘patient’, ‘client’, ‘consumer’) and 8 focused on cancer survivorship. Of the 33 examining generic terms, 27 reported a preference for ‘patient’ and four for ‘client’. Samples preferring ‘client’ were typically based in mental health settings and conducted in the USA. Of the eight cancer survivorship studies, five found a preference for ‘survivor’, and three ‘someone who had had cancer’.ConclusionsOverall, healthcare recipients appear to prefer the term ‘patient’, with few preferring ‘consumer’. Within general clinical and research contexts, it therefore seems appropriate to continue using the label ‘patient’ in the absence of knowledge about an individual’s preferences. Reasons for preferences (eg, familiarity, social identity) and the implications of labelling for healthcare have not been investigated adequately, necessitating future empirical (including qualitative) research.

Pathogenic language in psychiatric practice and how to combat it

“…4,5 Many surveys have indeed shown an overwhelming majority preferring to be addressed as patients. 6…”

“…Refer to people with a mental illness as ‘patients’ (in keeping with the rest of medicine) since research has found that the vast majority favour this designation over consumer, client or user. 6…”

Factors Associated with “Survivor Identity” in Men with Breast Cancer

“…How the term "survivor" is understood by patients may affect their quality of life and the care they are comfortable receiving. Endorsing the label or accepting the identity "survivor" has been associated with greater positive mood, satisfaction with life, and higher self-care [2,3]. However, not all people diagnosed with cancer are comfortable adopting the "survivor" label.…”

Informal mhealth at scale in Africa: Opportunities and challenges

“… 2 Debate about appropriate nomenclature (‘patients’, ‘clients’, ‘service users’) for people who access healthcare continues ( Costa, Mercieca-Bebber, Tesson, Seidler, & Lopez, 2019 ). Here, we use these terms interchangeably.…”