2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00443.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient characteristics and prescription patterns of atypical antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia

Abstract: Olanzapine and risperidone appear to be prescribed to patients with different sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Future research needs to explore the reasons for those differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, as one would expect from the literature [27,28], many patients also had physical health co-morbidity. The most common of these were gastrointestinal (22.1%), endocrine (14.7%), respiratory (10.7%) and cardiac (9.7%) disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Again, as one would expect from the literature [27,28], many patients also had physical health co-morbidity. The most common of these were gastrointestinal (22.1%), endocrine (14.7%), respiratory (10.7%) and cardiac (9.7%) disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Because the VHA has used electronic records for clinical care for many years, readily available administrative data sets can be used to identify and describe longitudinal antipsychotic prescribing pathways. Administrative data have been used extensively in other antipsychotic studies (11,20,(26)(27)(28). …”
Section: Setting and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, there are apparent systematic biases in the decision to place recipients on AA or TA medications. People who are white, have a substance abuse diagnosis or have a mood disorder are more likely to be placed on AA medications (Daumit et al, 2003;Herbeck et al, 2004;Ren et al, 2002). Fifth, our outcome measures were limited.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%