2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00194-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
299
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 399 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
299
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCE approach acknowledges that different patients with asthma may need specific information related to certain topics at different times in their life [42]. The change in prioritisation of topics between phase 1 and phase 2 further supports this premise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The PCE approach acknowledges that different patients with asthma may need specific information related to certain topics at different times in their life [42]. The change in prioritisation of topics between phase 1 and phase 2 further supports this premise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The benefits are in quality of life as well as disease control (22)(23)(24)(25). The potential negative sides of telemedicine are with regard to perceptions of potential disruption of services and interventions's due cost savings, concern about privacy and dislike of technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach taken to providing patients with information about their illness and treatment has changed dramatically since the publication of Cancer ward. The primary goal in health care today is 'patient-centred care' in which patients are treated with respect, given honest information and invited to take part in all decisions about their treatment and care (Michie, Miles, & Weinman, 2003)-although cancer patients' desire to make decisions about their treatments must not be taken for granted and doctors need to determine the extent to which each patient would like to be involved (Kvale & Bondevik, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%