Patient-Centeredness as Physician Behavioral Adaptability to Patient Preferences

Abstract

A physician who communicates in a patient-centered way is a physician who adapts his or her communication style to what each patient needs. In order to do so, the physician has to (1) accurately assess each patient's states and traits (interpersonal accuracy) and (2) possess a behavioral repertoire to choose from in order to actually adapt his or her behavior to different patients (behavioral adaptability). Physician behavioral adaptability describes the change in verbal or nonverbal behavior a physician shows when interacting with patients who have different preferences in terms of how the physician should interact with them. We hypothesized that physician behavioral adaptability to their patients' preferences would lead to better patient outcomes and that physician interpersonal accuracy was positively related to behavioral adaptability. To test these hypotheses, we recruited 61 physicians who completed an interpersonal accuracy test before being videotaped during four consultations with different patients. The 244 participating patients indicated their preferences for their physician's interaction style prior to the consultation and filled in a consultation outcomes questionnaire directly after the consultation. We coded the physician's verbal and nonverbal behavior for each of the consultations and compared it to the patients' preferences to obtain a measure of physician behavioral adaptability. Results partially confirmed our hypotheses in that female physicians who adapted their nonverbal (but not their verbal) behavior had patients who reported more positive consultation outcomes. Moreover, the more female physicians were accurate interpersonally, the more they showed verbal and nonverbal behavioral adaptability. For male physicians, more interpersonal accuracy was linked to less nonverbal adaptability.

Psychiatrists’ Attitude to the Psychiatrist’s Style of Dressing and Addressing: A Cross -Sectional Study

“…According to previous study the patients preferred to be addressed by psychiatrist by first name [22].…”

It takes two to tango: A dyadic approach to understanding the medication dialogue in patient-provider relationships

“…This may include examination of patient and provider personality traits, health literacy, and gender and race/ethnic concordance [36–39]). Contextual and situational factors that may affect the typologies include the interactional preferences of the partners[40], conversation topic (e.g., routine check-up vs. disclosure of new diagnosis) or context the conversation is occurring within (e.g., rushed appointment). Future exploration of the identified typologies might reveal useful ways to improve both care processes and outcomes at the patient, provider, and relationship-level, especially for chronic diseases such as hypertension.…”

Undergraduate training in breaking bad news: A continuation study exploring the patient perspective

“…[24][25][26] Measuring liking is less common, but the liking item selected for the present study ("All in all, I like this doctor a lot") is the most frequently used for affective evaluation of a physician. [24][25][26] Measuring liking is less common, but the liking item selected for the present study ("All in all, I like this doctor a lot") is the most frequently used for affective evaluation of a physician.…”

“…23 Trust was thus assessed with three items used in other studies and showing good reliability (Cronbach α = .91). [24][25][26] Measuring liking is less common, but the liking item selected for the present study ("All in all, I like this doctor a lot") is the most frequently used for affective evaluation of a physician. 14,27 Lastly, competence was measured using a questionnaire that showed good reliability in previous studies (seven items; Cronbach α = .94) and that assessed two distinct dimensions: medical competence (four items; Cronbach α = .94), and interpersonal competence (three items;…”