Patient-Based and Clinical Outcomes of Implant Telescopic Attachment–Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A 1-Year Longitudinal Prospective Study

Yunus, Norsiah Binti; Saub, Roslan; Ali, Tara Bai Taiyeb; Salleh, Nosizana Mohd; Baig, Mirza Rustum

doi:10.11607/jomi.3328

Cited by 22 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In within‐group comparisons in the immediate group, from the 3‐month time‐point onwards the gummy jelly scores were significantly better than the baseline score. This is concordant with a previous study in which 2‐IODs retained by bar or ball attachments showed significant improvement in MP 3 months after implant insertion . Conversely, the gummy jelly scores in the conventional group did not differ significantly from the baseline score at any time‐point after implant loading, contrary to the expectation that the gummy jelly score would significantly increase as it did in the immediate group.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

A preliminary comparison of masticatory performances between immediately loaded and conventionally loaded mandibular two‐implant overdentures with magnetic attachments

Komagamine

Kanazawa

Sato

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Two‐implant overdentures (2‐IODs) is an expected treatment option to improve the masticatory performance (MP) of edentulous individuals. Purpose The purpose of the current study was to compare MPs between immediately loaded and conventionally loaded mandibular 2‐IODs retained by magnet attachments. Materials and Methods Nineteen participants with edentulous mandibles were randomly assigned to an immediately loaded group or a conventionally loaded group. Each participant received two implants. The immediate group was loaded on the same day as implant insertion, whereas the conventional group was loaded 3 months after implant insertion. Both MP, measured by a color‐changeable chewing gum and a gummy jelly, and maximum occlusal force were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after implant insertion. Results A significantly higher MP, measured by gummy jelly, was observed at the 6‐month time‐point in the immediate group (P = .034). No significant differences in MP, measured by chewing gum, or maximum occlusal force were observed between the two groups at any time‐point. Conclusions Within the limitations of the present study, immediate loading of 2‐IODs could improve MP at an earlier time‐point than conventional loading of 2‐IODs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

A preliminary comparison of masticatory performances between immediately loaded and conventionally loaded mandibular two‐implant overdentures with magnetic attachments

Komagamine

Kanazawa

Sato

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, different observation was found in the posterior arches, where maxillary and mandibular ridge reduction was affected by the type of prostheses. There was lesser posterior ridge resorption with implant prostheses compared to conventional complete dentures, even though higher chewing forces and improved masticatory function were reported with implant therapy . This observation concurred with the results of Kordatzis et al .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…All the patients received their prostheses from the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya. Thirty‐four patients wearing mandibular overdenture with two implants inserted at canine areas in the parasymphyseal region and opposing conventional maxillary complete dentures were recruited from previous studies and invited to participate in this study. Of those patients, one deceased and four patients were not able to participate.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between occlusal force distribution in implant overdenture prostheses and residual ridge resorption

Khuder

Yunus

Sulaiman

et al. 2017

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to investigate residual ridge resorption (RRR) of anterior and posterior maxillary and mandibular edentulous ridges, in patients treated with mandibular implant overdentures (IOD) and compare with conventional complete denture (CD) wearers, and to determine at each location, the association of RRR with the occlusal forces distribution and other patients' variables. The anterior and posterior RRR of IOD (six males, 17 females) and CD (12 males, 11 females) groups were determined using baseline and follow-up dental panaromic radiographs (DPT) (mean intervals 4 ± 1·8 years). The bone ratios were calculated using proportional area: anatomic to fixed reference areas and mean difference of ratios between the intervals determined RRR. The ridge locations included anterior and posterior maxillary and posterior mandibular arches. The T-Scan III digital occlusal system was used to record anterior and posterior percentage occlusal force (%OF) distributions. There were significant differences in anterior and posterior %OF between treatment groups. Two-way anova showed RRR was significant for arch locations (P = 0·005), treatment group (IOD versus CD) (P = 0·001), however, no significant interaction (P = 0·799). Multivariate regression analyses showed significant association between RRR and %OF at anterior maxilla (P = 0·000) and posterior mandible (P = 0·023) and for treatment groups at posterior maxilla (P = 0·033) and mandibular areas (P = 0·021). Resorption was observed in IOD compared to CD groups, with 8·5% chance of less resorption in former and 7·8% in the latter location. Depending on arch location, ridge resorption at various locations was associated with occlusal force distribution and/or treatment groups (implant prostheses or conventional complete dentures).

show abstract

“…In ISOD group, two implants were placed in the parasymphyseal region and 1–2 weeks after abutment connection, the mandibular complete dentures were converted into ISOD following the intra‐oral pick‐up procedure (Yunus et al. ). Seventeen ISOD patients received telescopic attachment, while 11 had Locator attachments for denture retention.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of mandibular implant prostheses on the oral health‐related quality of life in partially and completely edentulous patients

Yunus

Masood

Saub

et al. 2015

Clinical Oral Implants Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Patient-Based and Clinical Outcomes of Implant Telescopic Attachment–Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A 1-Year Longitudinal Prospective Study

Cited by 22 publications

References 31 publications

A preliminary comparison of masticatory performances between immediately loaded and conventionally loaded mandibular two‐implant overdentures with magnetic attachments

A preliminary comparison of masticatory performances between immediately loaded and conventionally loaded mandibular two‐implant overdentures with magnetic attachments

Association between occlusal force distribution in implant overdenture prostheses and residual ridge resorption

Impact of mandibular implant prostheses on the oral health‐related quality of life in partially and completely edentulous patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About