The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.4.389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient and Physician Preferences for Surgical and Adjuvant Treatment Options for Rectal Cancer

Abstract: Hypothesis Patients and their clinicians hold varying preferences for surgical and adjuvant treatment therapies for rectal cancer. Design Preferences were determined using the Prospective Measure of Preference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A method to reduce polyp size could be useful in cases where an adenoma is too large for endoscopic resection and/ or when the patient, a er being fully informed of treatment options, does not accept the recommended therapy [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method to reduce polyp size could be useful in cases where an adenoma is too large for endoscopic resection and/ or when the patient, a er being fully informed of treatment options, does not accept the recommended therapy [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians are known to favor interventions with which they are most familiar, or most skilled at in their routine practice. 4,12,13 It was interesting to note that we found several respondents were unable to consider participation in the trial because they lacked the surgical training or experience to be able to offer both procedures. This acknowledged differential surgical expertise provides an argument in favor of revisiting expertise-based randomized trials for surgical research in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SES has been used successfully in different surgical specialties 26,27 and may be very useful in urogynecological surgery. Increasingly qualitative research methods are being used to assess preferences and views relating to randomization and other factors of trial design in several disease areas 12,13,16,28 and our questionnaire study can be seen as a similar intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many patients with low cancers will-unless the tumours are very small (T1, early T2)-be treated with an abdominoperineal resection (APR) and a permanent stoma, a mutilating procedure with substantial impact on quality of life [2][3][4]. Patients often express a strong wish to avoid a colostomy if possible [5], and some elderly and heavily co-morbid patients may not be candidates for radical surgery at all [6,7]. Consequently, alternative treatment strategies for local tumour control are currently the focus of significant research efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%