2010
DOI: 10.1080/07351690903203287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient–Analyst Interconnectedness: Personal Notes on Close Encounters of a New Dimension

Abstract: It is impossible to write about my personal development as a psychotherapist and psychoanalyst in Israel without relating to the powerful impact of the fate of the Jewish people on my family's history and therefore on mine. It is a history interwoven with narratives of loss and survival.My father was born in Poland, in the vicinity of Warsaw, to a wealthy family. When World War I reached that area, everybody ran for their lives, but my grandfather refused to abandon his lands and possessions. It was not until … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also in France, the 1983 publication of Granoff and Rey’s L’occulte, objet de la pensée freudienne (The Occult: Object of Freudian Thought) marked a renewal in psychoanalytic explorations of telepathy (see, e.g., Barbier and Decourt 1998; Bernat 2001). The last two decades have shown a growing interest concerning this topic, with papers published in many psychoanalytic journals (Brottman 2011; de Peyer 2014, 2016; Eshel 2006, 2010, 2012, 2019; Mayer 2001, 2007; Papazian 2017; Reichbart 2018; Rosenbaum 2011; Sánchez-Medina 2018; Totton 2003, 2007). Notable here is a paper by Elizabeth Lloyd Mayer (2001), which included the posthumous publication of an article by Robert Stoller concerning telepathy.…”
Section: A Century and More Of Diverging Positions Concerning Telepathymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also in France, the 1983 publication of Granoff and Rey’s L’occulte, objet de la pensée freudienne (The Occult: Object of Freudian Thought) marked a renewal in psychoanalytic explorations of telepathy (see, e.g., Barbier and Decourt 1998; Bernat 2001). The last two decades have shown a growing interest concerning this topic, with papers published in many psychoanalytic journals (Brottman 2011; de Peyer 2014, 2016; Eshel 2006, 2010, 2012, 2019; Mayer 2001, 2007; Papazian 2017; Reichbart 2018; Rosenbaum 2011; Sánchez-Medina 2018; Totton 2003, 2007). Notable here is a paper by Elizabeth Lloyd Mayer (2001), which included the posthumous publication of an article by Robert Stoller concerning telepathy.…”
Section: A Century and More Of Diverging Positions Concerning Telepathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A question that concerns both historical and contemporary publications on telepathy is its conditions of emergence (de Peyer 2016; Eshel 2010; Farber 2017; Rottenberg 2017; Sánchez-Medina 2018). Why and how do seemingly telepathic occurrences emerge in the psychoanalytic setting?…”
Section: Telepathic Processes During Analysis: Separation Anxiety Trauma and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the many years that have passed since I treated Nir, I have come to realize that transformation in the most cut‐off, blocked, deadening, empty, desperate, and despairing psychic zones—zones of psychic breakdown, madness, annihilation, and catastrophe—may become possible only when the analyst/therapist is willing and able to be‐within (and with‐in ) the patient's experiential world and within the grip of the analytic process, with the ensuing patient‐analyst deep‐level interconnectedness or “witnessing” psyche‐with‐psyche (Eshel , , , , , , , ). This interconnectedness, which becomes at‐one‐ment when the analyst puts him‐/herself entirely within the patient's emotional reality, is difficult and demanding, an unyielding, ongoing struggle with the underlying catastrophe to reach a new and formative, deep experiencing, beyond epistemological exploration‐K.…”
Section: Clinical Example: a Voice From A Haunting Dungeon Of Madnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern physics, different paradigms—classical physics and quantum mechanics—do coexist (Kuhn ). Whereas classical physics is based on assumptions of linear causality, determinism, and a sharp separation between observer and observed, quantum mechanics introduced into scientific thinking enigmatic principles of uncertainty and inseparability of observer and observed, the crucial formative effect of the process of observation, and the fundamental organization of unbroken wholeness that underlies our perceived world of separateness at the particle level (Bohm ; Botella and Botella ; Eshel , , , , , ; Field ; Godwin ; Kulka ; Mayer ; Sucharov ; Suchet ).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughts: Reading Late Bion and Winnicott Into “Qmentioning
confidence: 99%