Patient Advice and Liaison Services: results of an audit survey in England

Abstract

Objective To assess the extent national standards for Patient Advice and Liaison Services (PALS) were achieved across England.Context PALS are an important element of patient and public involvement strategy in England. Seven national standards for PALS were identified. Previous research has not assessed PALS across all trust types in England.Design Audit survey as part of a mixed method Ôrealistic evaluationÕ in which regularities of context, mechanism and outcome are hypothesized and tested. Setting and participants PALS based in 570 NHS trusts in England between October and December 2005.Main outcome measures Self reported achievement against PALS national standards.Results Three hundred and thirty-six valid responses were received, a response rate of 65%. However because some PALS serve more than one trust, this represents an estimated 76% of trusts. Overall, PALS rated themselves highly against all the standards, though somewhat less highly against standard 2 (seamlessness across health and social care) and standard 6 (acting as a catalyst for culture change). There was a wide range of responses with regard to PALS budget, staffing and activity levels, and statistically significant associations between levels of funding and staffing and higher levels of performance.Conclusions The overall response rate was good so there can be a high degree of confidence in the reliability of the results. The results indicate the challenging context in which PALS are operating. Although the majority of PALS are single trust PALS, there is a high degree of variation in key mechanism factors such as budget and staffing.

Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation

“…basic science vs. applied, qualitative vs. quantitative, pilot studies vs. full trials, clinical vs. epidemiological, primary vs. secondary data, action research, translational research) and we could not hope to cover the full diversity in our case studies. From previous experience of case study research, 21 we believed that eight case studies would enable us both to examine the CMO regularities in depth and to look for generalisable regularities across the case studies. This number of case studies did not enable us to examine all potential types of research study, but did enable us to include the most common, for example qualitative, mixed methods, feasibility and clinical trials.…”

Choice cuts: parsing policymakers’ pursuit of patient empowerment from an individual perspective

“…These publicly funded infrastructures first emerged in the US to facilitate choices among insurers (McCormack et al ., 1996) but have in the past decade expanded to include ‘patient navigator’ programs easing patients’ transitions along the care continuum for chronic illnesses (Dohan and Schrag, 2005). A comparable and in some ways more extensive infrastructure has emerged in the UK over the past ten years, in the form of the National Health Service (NHS)-Direct help-line and the Patient Advising and Liaison Service, though access to these supports remains checkered and their impact modest (Evans et al ., 2008).…”