2018
DOI: 10.2196/medinform.9200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Adherence to Scheduled Vital Sign Measurements During Home Telemonitoring: Analysis of the Intervention Arm in a Before and After Trial

Abstract: BackgroundIn a home telemonitoring trial, patient adherence with scheduled vital signs measurements is an important aspect that has not been thoroughly studied and for which data in the literature are limited. Levels of adherence have been reported as varying from approximately 40% to 90%, and in most cases, the adherence rate usually dropped off steadily over time. This drop is more evident in the first few weeks or months after the start. Higher adherence rates have been reported for simple types of monitori… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This feedback, however, consisted of generic messages such as “your body temperature is within a safe range” and is something that needs to be tailored to a patient’s specific context. Moreover, measuring body temperature demands some effort and is not as easy to answer than questions like “do you have a runny nose?” or “do you cough?” Using a smart device with sensor data could overcome this barrier [ 18 , 19 ]. The fact that about 700 users reported to be satisfied with the information in the app (mean 8 out of 10 score) and rated the symptom diary with a mean 8 out of 10 score as well demonstrated user’s willingness to participate in this kind of functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feedback, however, consisted of generic messages such as “your body temperature is within a safe range” and is something that needs to be tailored to a patient’s specific context. Moreover, measuring body temperature demands some effort and is not as easy to answer than questions like “do you have a runny nose?” or “do you cough?” Using a smart device with sensor data could overcome this barrier [ 18 , 19 ]. The fact that about 700 users reported to be satisfied with the information in the app (mean 8 out of 10 score) and rated the symptom diary with a mean 8 out of 10 score as well demonstrated user’s willingness to participate in this kind of functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At-home telemonitoring is a validated method for monitoring disease states across multiple specialties including cardiology, pulmonology, obstetrics, and ophthalmology. 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 34 , 35 Despite this, real-world usage of home monitoring devices can be challenging as evidenced by the current dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the results of the current study highlight some of the challenges accompanying home monitoring. 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 Telemonitoring strategies range from simple phone calls with health professionals to complex devices like ForeseeHome. Some monitors, like the Holter device and other cardiac monitors, collect data automatically and over short periods of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy and reliability of the device were validated. Based on previous studies, the monitor was designed to automatically record BP at 1‐hr interval during awake hours (Celler, Argha, Varnfield, & Jayasena, 2018). The BP monitoring system also included a secure online account to track CVD‐related health factors (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%