2020
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1845288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient acceptability and usability of a self-administered electronic patient-reported outcome assessment in HIV care: relationship with health behaviors and outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Undisclosed nicotine use would result in selection bias through inappropriately categorized participants; however, the use of self-administration through tablet has been shown to greatly reduce social desirability bias and increase the likelihood of accurate reporting of sensitive or potentially stigmatizing information. 55 The structure of our PROs did not allow a precise determination of days of use or amount of nicotine used, although our shift from categorical to continuous frequency of use is sufficiently robust to infer dose–response and is consistent with results considering the variable with an ordinal parameterization. In addition, although we assessed PWH by gender (and included transgender PWH), this analytic cohort lacked power to further differentiate analyses by transgender status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Undisclosed nicotine use would result in selection bias through inappropriately categorized participants; however, the use of self-administration through tablet has been shown to greatly reduce social desirability bias and increase the likelihood of accurate reporting of sensitive or potentially stigmatizing information. 55 The structure of our PROs did not allow a precise determination of days of use or amount of nicotine used, although our shift from categorical to continuous frequency of use is sufficiently robust to infer dose–response and is consistent with results considering the variable with an ordinal parameterization. In addition, although we assessed PWH by gender (and included transgender PWH), this analytic cohort lacked power to further differentiate analyses by transgender status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Comparison of the chart reviews relating to phases when providers did and did not receive the PRO results used the Fisher exact test with a significance level of 0.05. Yes Depression (PHQ-9) [34,35] Yes Yes Anxiety (HIV symptoms inventory) [36] Yes Yes Adherence (VAS) Yes Yes Satisfaction with HIV medications (HATQoL) [37] Yes Yes Nicotine use Yes Yes Alcohol use (AUDIT-C) [38] Yes Yes Substance use (ASSIST) [39] Yes Yes Gender identity Yes Yes Sexual risk behavior (SRBI) [40] Yes Yes Sexual orientation Yes Yes Intimate partner violence (IPV-4) [41] Yes Yes Acceptability E-scale [18] Yes…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perspectives of participating PWH on the acceptability and usability of the PRO platform were evaluated by means of the Acceptability E-scale incorporated into the PRO (Supplementary Appendix 1), which measures 7 components of acceptability using Likert scales [ 18 ]. This was supplemented by 200 post-visit structured surveys carried out during the delivery phase to assess patient perception of the impact of PROs on care (100 per site; Supplementary Appendix 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These routine clinic visits present an important window of opportunity for healthcare providers to identify and address some of the problems that can contribute to poor HRQoL. However, PLHIV often encounter communication barriers with their healthcare providers and may not feel that providers are responsive to their healthcare priorities ( Antunes et al, 2020 ; Fredericksen et al, 2020a ; Okoli et al, 2020 ). Furthermore, providers may overlook important symptoms ( Edelman et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%