2015
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2015004760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathways vs. Pipelines to Broadening Participation in the Stem Workforce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experts also have the opportunity to share their stories and paths taken that led to their current careers. These shared experiences can serve as an inspiration for the students to follow an otherwise unknown path (11,19). Recent studies have suggested that instead of continuing to approach STEM education as an often "leaky" pipeline, we should encourage an alterna-tive pathway model (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The experts also have the opportunity to share their stories and paths taken that led to their current careers. These shared experiences can serve as an inspiration for the students to follow an otherwise unknown path (11,19). Recent studies have suggested that instead of continuing to approach STEM education as an often "leaky" pipeline, we should encourage an alterna-tive pathway model (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shared experiences can serve as an inspiration for the students to follow an otherwise unknown path (11,19). Recent studies have suggested that instead of continuing to approach STEM education as an often "leaky" pipeline, we should encourage an alterna-tive pathway model (19). In the pathway model, there are multiple routes towards the required training for science careers (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, even with positive hiring outcomes such as those reported by the Big Ten AGEP Alliance, there is still a need for inclusivity within the professoriate, as well as the need to address structural issues. 20 This can be addressed by institutional change, such as those initiatives AGEP and ADVANCE support.…”
Section: Broadening Participation In the Professoriatementioning
confidence: 99%