Pathways to adolescent alcohol use: family environment, peer influence, and parental expectations

Nash, Susan; McQueen, Amy; Bray, James H.

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.06.004

Cited by 358 publications

(349 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

307

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Responses were coded so that 0 = "Never," 1 = "A few times a year," 2 = "Once a month to a few times a month," 3 = "Once a week to a few times a week," and 4 = "Once a day to more than once a day." Similar measures of frequency have been used in past research (Li et al, 2001;Nash et al, 2005).…”

Section: 32mentioning

confidence: 99%

Substance use outcomes 5½ years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions

Spoth

Randall

Trudeau

et al. 2008

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

103

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reports adolescent substance use outcomes of universal family and school preventive interventions 5½ years past baseline. Participants were 1677 7th grade students from schools (N = 36) randomly assigned to the school-based Life Skills Training plus the Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (LST + SFP 10-14), LST-alone, or a control condition. Selfreports were collected at baseline, 6 months later following the interventions, then yearly through the 12th grade. Measures included initiation-alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and drunkenness, along with a Substance Initiation Index (SII)-and measures of more serious use-frequency of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use, drunkenness frequency, monthly poly-substance use, and advanced poly-substance use. Analyses ruled out differential attrition. For all substance initiation outcomes, one or both intervention groups showed significant, positive point-in-time differences at 12th grade and/or significant growth trajectory outcomes when compared with the control group. Although no main effects for the more serious substance use outcomes were observed, a higher-risk subsample demonstrated significant, positive 12th grade point-in-time and/or growth trajectory outcomes for one or both intervention groups on all measures. The observed pattern of results likely reflects a combination of predispositions of the higher-risk subsample, the timing of the interventions, and baseline differences between experimental conditions favoring the control group.

show abstract

Section: 32mentioning

confidence: 99%

Substance use outcomes 5½ years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions

Spoth

Randall

Trudeau

et al. 2008

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

103

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Social effect is a strong factor related to youth health risk behaviours such as tobacco use (Gwon & Jeong, 2016; Gwon et al, 2018) and alcohol use (Nash, McQueen, & Bray, 2005). These days, young people are socially active in both offline and online settings (Huang, Unger, et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concept analysis of impressionability among adolescents and young adults

Gwon

Jeong

2018

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo report a concept analysis of impressionability among adolescents and young adults.BackgroundAdolescence and young adulthood are critical periods to establish health behaviour. Environmental determinants are associated with youth health risk behaviours. These populations are impressionable to a range of social and physical environmental factors.DesignConcept analysis.MethodsWe selected 17 studies to review from Psych INFO, ERIC, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar as well as the University of Virginia library. We did not apply date limits. We included search terms: “adolescent”; “youth”; “young adult”; “impressionability”; and “impressionable.”ResultsThe defining attributes of impressionability among youths were a state where: (a) one is able to be susceptible to external stimuli; (b) one is incapable of reasonable judgement; and (c) one has a changeability to accept or modify one's attitude and behaviour. We identified antecedents, consequences, and cases of impressionability.

show abstract

“…Despite the increasing number of socialization agents that accompany the transition into adolescence (e.g., teachers and peers), many aspects of earlier parenting have been prospectively linked with offspring outcomes throughout the adolescent years (Brown et al, 1993;Doyle and Markiewicz, 1996). In relation to adolescent drinking, for example, parental warmth (Hops et al, 1999;Nash et al, 2005;White et al, 2000), parental autonomy granting (Herman et al, 1997), parental engagement/involvement (Simons-Morton and Chen, 2005), and parental knowledge of offspring's activities/whereabouts/peer relationships (Ary et al, 1999;Rose et al, 2001b) have all been linked with decreased risk, whereas parent-adolescent relational tension (Ary et al, 1999) and excessive parental discipline (Latendresse et al, 2008) have been associated with increases in alcohol-use behaviors. In addition, we know that parenting partially mediates the influence of parents' drinking-related behaviors on the same behaviors in their offspring.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the Etiology of Associations Between Perceived Parenting and Adolescents' Alcohol Use: Common Genetic and/or Environmental Liabilities?

Latendresse¹,

Rose²,

Viken³

et al. 2010

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: Although twin studies yield consistent evidence of heritability in the frequency of adolescent alcohol use, parallel findings on parenting are more equivocal, supporting the role of genes in affective parenting but not as supportive in relation to parental control. The extent to which these patterns generalize to more nuanced forms of parenting is less clear. Furthermore, despite evidence linking parents' socialization practices with adolescents' alcohol-use behaviors, this study is the first attempt to determine the sources of this covariation. Method: The present study used epidemiological data from 4,729 adolescent twins (2,329 females) to examine the nature of associations between their perceptions of parenting at age 12 and frequencies of alcohol use at age 14. Univariate analyses assessed the relative contributions of genetic and environmental influences on variability within six domains of parenting. Among those displaying consistent evidence of heritability, bivariate models were used to explore sources of covariation with drinking frequency. Results: Univariate models suggested both genetic and environmental sources of variability across parenting phenotypes, including sex-specific sources of genetic liability within one dimension of parenting. However, despite evidence for heritability, bivariate analyses indicated that the covariation between alcohol use and perceptions of parental knowledge and warmth were entirely mediated through shared environmental pathways. Conclusions: This study elucidates genetic and environmental sources of variability within individual parenting behaviors and characterizes the etiological nature of the association between parental socialization and adolescent alcohol use. The identification of specific and modifiable socialization practices will be crucial for the future development of parent-based prevention/intervention strategies. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 71, 313-325, 2010)

show abstract

Pathways to adolescent alcohol use: family environment, peer influence, and parental expectations

Cited by 358 publications

References 35 publications

Substance use outcomes 5½ years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions

Substance use outcomes 5½ years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions

Concept analysis of impressionability among adolescents and young adults

Examining the Etiology of Associations Between Perceived Parenting and Adolescents' Alcohol Use: Common Genetic and/or Environmental Liabilities?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About