2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathways of coupled arsenic and iron cycling in high arsenic groundwater of the Hetao basin, Inner Mongolia, China: An iron isotope approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kirk et al, 2010), while pyrite did not dissolve in the pH 3 solution used in the extractions. In our previous study (H.M. Guo et al, 2013), relatively low As and Fe (II) concentrations and high H 2 S and δ 56 Fe were observed in the same transition area. The enrichment of heavy δ 56 Fe in groundwater in the transition area reflects the formation of pyrite (H.M. Guo et al, 2013).…”
Section: 1029/2019wr025492mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Kirk et al, 2010), while pyrite did not dissolve in the pH 3 solution used in the extractions. In our previous study (H.M. Guo et al, 2013), relatively low As and Fe (II) concentrations and high H 2 S and δ 56 Fe were observed in the same transition area. The enrichment of heavy δ 56 Fe in groundwater in the transition area reflects the formation of pyrite (H.M. Guo et al, 2013).…”
Section: 1029/2019wr025492mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In general, larger ranges of δ 56 Fe values have been found for marine sediment pore waters (-3.5 to 1.1‰, n=150, Fehr et al, 2008;Homoky et al, 2009;Scholz et al, 2014a;2014b;Severmann et al, 2006;Staubwasser et al, 2006) and brackish pore waters in estuaries (-5.0 to 0.7‰, n=48, Rouxel et al, 2008;Roy et al, 2012). In comparison, pore waters in aquifers and mine drainage settings show a narrower range in δ 56 Fe values (-2.4 to -0.2‰, n=22, Guo et al, 2013;Herbert Jr and Schippers, 2008;Tangalos et al, 2010;Teutsch et al, 2005;Xie et al, 2013;, which is similar to that for lake systems (-2.1 to 0.5‰, n=52). The negative…”
Section: The Greatest Difference In δ 56mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The highly As(V)-contaminated groundwater typically contains Fe(II) with concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 44.3 mg L −1 [13][14][15][16]. In areas with serious arsenic contamination, the molar ratio of As:Fe can reach 0.03 [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%