2022
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathways for avian influenza virus spread: GPS reveals wild waterfowl in commercial livestock facilities and connectivity with the natural wetland landscape

Abstract: Zoonotic diseases are of considerable concern to the human population and viruses such as avian influenza (AIV) threaten food security, wildlife conservation and human health. Wild waterfowl and the natural wetlands they use are known AIV reservoirs, with birds capable of virus transmission to domestic poultry populations. While infection risk models have linked migration routes and AIV outbreaks, there is a limited understanding of wild waterfowl presence on commercial livestock facilities, and movement patte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Central Valley and San Francisco Bay Estuary of California are hotspots of mercury contamination in North America [4,46] and are important sites for overwintering waterfowl; approximately 60% of the migratory waterfowl in the Pacific Flyway overwinter in this region annually [47,48]. Multiple waterfowl species co-occur at overwintering sites in the region, which enables cross-species influenza transmission and viral reassortment [49,50], and waterfowl occasionally use wetlands and agricultural habitats near and within poultry facilities [51]. This combination of mercury contamination, high waterfowl abundance and intensive poultry production makes northern California an important region for understanding how mercury contamination affects influenza prevalence and wildlife health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Central Valley and San Francisco Bay Estuary of California are hotspots of mercury contamination in North America [4,46] and are important sites for overwintering waterfowl; approximately 60% of the migratory waterfowl in the Pacific Flyway overwinter in this region annually [47,48]. Multiple waterfowl species co-occur at overwintering sites in the region, which enables cross-species influenza transmission and viral reassortment [49,50], and waterfowl occasionally use wetlands and agricultural habitats near and within poultry facilities [51]. This combination of mercury contamination, high waterfowl abundance and intensive poultry production makes northern California an important region for understanding how mercury contamination affects influenza prevalence and wildlife health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies mostly tried to explain the variation in the occurrence of HPAIV introductions with environmental variables, such as distance to waterways and vegetation index [ 18 , 19 , 33 ]. Others also included surveillance or telemetry data to track the movements of a selection of wild bird species in a certain time period [ 17 , 29 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], but most studies did not include detailed count data on wild bird species distribution to analyze HPAIV introductions on poultry farms. Environmental variables can be considered as a proxy for habitat suitability for wild birds, and were, in our study, less suitable predictors than the densities of the actual bird species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such data have proven valuable in many previous spatiotemporal analyses. For example, it has been shown in many studies that the presence of wetlands is vital as they are an important habitat for many waterfowl species [ 32 , 33 , 35 ]. In the current study, the original land cover classes were aggregated into five major classes, which decreased the resolution of land cover classification in the analyses, and may have reduced sensitivity of these variables for the prediction of farm outbreak probability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capture timing, locations, and techniques varied by species and included funnel traps, rocket/cannon nets, swim‐in corrals, and handheld dip nets. For more details on capture and marking, see Appendix S1: Supplementary Methods and Figure S1, McDuie, Casazza, Overton, et al (2019), and McDuie et al (2022). Pintails were captured in September, October, and February 2016–2019 in and near Suisun Marsh (San Francisco Bay Estuary; 38.138, −121.978), Colusa National Wildlife Refuge (NWR; 39.145, −122.044), and the Upper Butte Basin Wildlife Area (WA) in the Central Valley (39.467, −121.877).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%