2021
DOI: 10.1002/sim.8957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathway testing for longitudinal metabolomics

Abstract: We propose a top‐down approach for pathway analysis of longitudinal metabolite data. We apply a score test based on a shared latent process mixed model which can identify pathways with differentially progressing metabolites. The strength of our approach is that it can handle unbalanced designs, deals with potential missing values in the longitudinal markers, and gives valid results even with small sample sizes. Contrary to bottom‐up approaches, correlations between metabolites are explicitly modeled leveraging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the MLPMM, we can compute the predicted random effects and by adapting the formulas provided by Ebrahimpoor et al 15 to the MLPMM of Equation ( 1 ) as follows: where , is the equivalent of with as entries, is the random‐effects design matrix associated to in ( 1 ), , , , and where I denotes identity matrices and “all‐ones” matrices (ie, matrices whose entries are all equal to 1) of dimension .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the MLPMM, we can compute the predicted random effects and by adapting the formulas provided by Ebrahimpoor et al 15 to the MLPMM of Equation ( 1 ) as follows: where , is the equivalent of with as entries, is the random‐effects design matrix associated to in ( 1 ), , , , and where I denotes identity matrices and “all‐ones” matrices (ie, matrices whose entries are all equal to 1) of dimension .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the MLPMM, we can compute the predicted random effects û si = (û s0i , û s1i ) and bsi = ( b1si , … , br s si ) by adapting the formulas provided by Ebrahimpoor et al 15 to the MLPMM of Equation ( 1) as follows:…”
Section: Derivation Of the Predicted Random Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separate characterization of each of these omic datasets has been presented in previous publications [34][35][36][37][38][39]. Muscle RNA-seq showed that a considerable number of genes were differentially expressed between WT mice and the three dystrophic groups [34,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We used a Holm-Bonferroni adjusted P-value for the difference in pathway-clustered metabolites between groups using the GlobalTest. 22 Pathways with both an effect score $0.1 and a Holm adjusted P-value ,0.05 were identified as key features differentiating groups. Within key pathways, metabolites reported at levels different than expected through a GlobalTest (P , 0.05) and as important to the metabolic pathways (importance score $0.1) were identified as key individual metabolites.…”
Section: Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%