1997
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.17-02-00597.1997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathway-Specific Synaptic Plasticity: Activity-Dependent Enhancement and Suppression of Long-Term Heterosynaptic Facilitation at Converging Inputs on a Single Target

Abstract: To explore mechanisms of long-term, pathway-specific synaptic plasticity, we examined consequences of differential stimulation of Aplysia sensorimotor connections in culture where two sensory neuron (SN) inputs converge on a single target motor cell L7. A single pairing of tetanus in one SN with bath application of 5-HT evoked long-term (24 hr) increase in efficacy of the SN connection given paired stimulation that was comparable in magnitude to the increase in synaptic efficacy evoked with repeated applicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(135 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid the possible confusion of terms, we make a distinction between the notions of heterosynaptic plasticity (Dittman & Regehr, 1997;Schacher, Wu, & Sun, 1997;Vogt & Nicoll, 1999) and neuromodulation of plasticity (Bailey, Giustetto, Huang, Hawkins, & Kandel, 2000;Fellous & Linster, 1998). In contrast to the conventionally used monosynaptic Hebbian learning, heterosynaptic Hebbian learning allows for activity-independent modification of synapses such that a synapse can also be updated when only the pre-synaptic or post-synaptic component has been active, and more generally, even when neither have been active.…”
Section: Evolution Of Reinforcement Learning-a Different Approach To mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To avoid the possible confusion of terms, we make a distinction between the notions of heterosynaptic plasticity (Dittman & Regehr, 1997;Schacher, Wu, & Sun, 1997;Vogt & Nicoll, 1999) and neuromodulation of plasticity (Bailey, Giustetto, Huang, Hawkins, & Kandel, 2000;Fellous & Linster, 1998). In contrast to the conventionally used monosynaptic Hebbian learning, heterosynaptic Hebbian learning allows for activity-independent modification of synapses such that a synapse can also be updated when only the pre-synaptic or post-synaptic component has been active, and more generally, even when neither have been active.…”
Section: Evolution Of Reinforcement Learning-a Different Approach To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuromodulation of synaptic plasticity further enhances the learning rule by allowing a three-factor interaction in the learning process: through neuromodulation the activity of a neuron can gate the plasticity of a synapse between two other neurons. Both heterosynaptic plasticity and neuromodulatory gating of synaptic plasticity have been demonstrated in neural tissues (Bailey et al, 2000;Dittman & Regehr, 1997;Fellous & Linster, 1998;Schacher et al, 1997;Vogt & Nicoll, 1999), and have been recognized to increase the computational complexity of synaptic learning (Bailey et al, 2000;Fellous & Linster, 1998;Wickens and Kotter, 1995). By allowing for heterosynaptic learning and neuromodulation of plasticity, we defined a very large search space in which the genetic algorithm could search for optimal synaptic learning rules.…”
Section: Evolution Of Reinforcement Learning-a Different Approach To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term potentiation (LTP) (Lin & Glanzman, 1994b), as well as several associative forms of learning-related plasticity (Murphy & Glanzman, 1996;Schacher et al 1997;Bao et al 1998), of sensorimotor connections all require a rise in postsynaptic intracellular Ca 2+ . To test whether the effect of 5-HT on the Glu-PSP depends upon intracellular Ca 2+ in the motor neuron, we added BAPTA (100-200 mM) to the standard micropipette solution.…”
Section: Bapta Blocks 5-ht-induced Facilitation Of the Glutamate Respmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-HT-induced facilitation of the glutamate response does not depend upon activation of NMDA-type receptors LTP of sensorimotor synapses, as well as some other forms of learning-related enhancement, require activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-type receptors (Lin & Glanzman, 1994a, b;Murphy & Glanzman, 1997;Schacher et al 1997 of the glutamate response requires activation of NMDAtype receptors in motor neurons, we applied the NMDA receptor antagonist APV (100 µM) to the perfusion medium in conjunction with 5-HT. The presence of APV did not block facilitation of the glutamate response by 5-HT.…”
Section: Bapta Blocks 5-ht-induced Facilitation Of the Glutamate Respmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One mechanism that could account for our results is a homeostatic process in which the strength of multiple synaptic inputs onto a single target is regulated, such that overall synaptic strength is conserved. Evidence for the operation of such a homeostatic process has come mostly from studies of cell culture systems or development (Glanzman et al, 1991;Schacher et al, 1997;Turrigiano and Nelson, 2004); there is a paucity of evidence for homeostatic regulation of synaptic strength in studies of learning-related systems. Interpreted as the effect of homeostatic regulation, the decrement we observed in the anticorrelated CSϪ pathway reflects a competitive loss of synaptic strength because of the increase in strength in the coactive CSϩ pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%