2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathway-Selective Sensitization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for Target-Based Whole-Cell Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
170
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of novel small molecules that penetrate the bacterial cell envelope and efficiently and selectively inactivate a bacterial target remains a major bottleneck. Target-based whole-cell screens, which use bacteria underexpressing a selected protein to bias hit compounds toward inhibitors of that protein (37)(38)(39)(40)(41), promise to widen this bottleneck and are best applied to proteins that represent well-validated targets. The strategy we used to identify NadE as such a validated target is scalable and can be applied, in principle, to any gene in the Mtb genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of novel small molecules that penetrate the bacterial cell envelope and efficiently and selectively inactivate a bacterial target remains a major bottleneck. Target-based whole-cell screens, which use bacteria underexpressing a selected protein to bias hit compounds toward inhibitors of that protein (37)(38)(39)(40)(41), promise to widen this bottleneck and are best applied to proteins that represent well-validated targets. The strategy we used to identify NadE as such a validated target is scalable and can be applied, in principle, to any gene in the Mtb genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. tuberculosis H37RvMA pMSP12:GFP in GAST-Fe media [32], and M. tuberculosis H37Rv:pCHERRY3 [31] in 7H9 + OADC. The MIC values in the GAST-Fe assay were consistently lower (2-3 fold lower for CM8, CM12, and CM14 and 14 fold lower for CM15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CM8, CM12, CM14 and CM15 were screened using two independent methods as described below. Here, the standard broth microdilution method was performed using M. tuberculosis H37RvMA pMSP12:GFP [32]. A 10 ml culture was grown in glycerol-alanine-salts with 0.05% Tween 80 and iron (0.05%; GAST-Fe) pH 6.6, to an OD600 of 0.6 -0.7.…”
Section: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these settings researchers were able to screen entire libraries of under-expression strains against whole chemical libraries and successfully identify inhibitors of growth and their MOA in a single screen, greatly reducing both the time and resources necessary for selecting interesting hits. The first steps providing proof-of-concept studies toward applying this approach to mycobacteria have been made already: Abrahams and coworkers used promoter replacement to decrease the expression of icl1, lysA, and panC, and they were able to validate these genes as important for M. tuberculosis survival in vitro (129). They then used the panC knockdown strain in a target-based whole-cell screen (TB-WCS) of a small compound library (600 compounds) to identify 37 hits.…”
Section: Leveraging Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%