2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paths, events and resource use: New developments in understanding innovation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on Purchase et al (2016), the coding of critical events highlights the embedded and temporal nature of the innovation path undertaken by Sinergiain connection with the development of the network around them (Hedaa and Törnroos, 2008). The establishment of a framework agreement (Mouzas and Ford, 2012) and business relationships with selected actors in the local academic and business settingalready familiar and active in the I4.0 trajectoryrepresent key activities allowing to tap into valuable technological and managerial resources.…”
Section: The Innovation Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on Purchase et al (2016), the coding of critical events highlights the embedded and temporal nature of the innovation path undertaken by Sinergiain connection with the development of the network around them (Hedaa and Törnroos, 2008). The establishment of a framework agreement (Mouzas and Ford, 2012) and business relationships with selected actors in the local academic and business settingalready familiar and active in the I4.0 trajectoryrepresent key activities allowing to tap into valuable technological and managerial resources.…”
Section: The Innovation Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sponsored enterprises form closer connections with governments, banks, venture capitalists, and other actors, which allows them to gain easier access to resources (Li et al, 2008; Guariglia and Liu, 2014; Song et al, 2015; Yu et al, 2016). Because of these extra resources, sponsored enterprises are more likely to invest in R&D and show significant innovation performance (Wan et al, 2011; Keupp and Gassmann, 2013; Du and Mickiewicz, 2016; Purchase et al, 2016). Accordingly, we propose the following hypothesis:Hypothesis Organizational sponsorship improves firms' innovation performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kivleniece and Quelin (2012) argue that public-private ties are marked by inherent tensions between private profit-oriented goals and public goals. This means that the knowledge generated by collaboration between universities and private companies could be made later available to other Ambidextrous leadership (214) (Cho et al, 2020); (Li et al, 2016); (Suzuki, 2018); (2) (Asif & Vries, 2014); (Fundin et al, 2021); (Rafailidis et al, 2017); (Harmancioglu et al, 2020); (Purchase et al, 2016); (Strese et al, 2016) Ambidextrous strategies and the need to balance both competition and innovation X X (Sengupta & Ray, 2017) Interrelationships between the two pillars of ambidexterity (research and knowledge transfer) in universities -- (Pangarso et al, 2020) Nexus between absorption capacity, and sustainable competitive advantage X companies through the universities. However, this tension, derived from who has the right to exploit the knowledge generated, is not different from the tensions found in open innovation.…”
Section: Ambidexterity In the Context Of Entrepreneurial Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%