1984
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(84)90002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathophysiology of the opening of the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers in acute hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on the water intoxication model have not demonstrated increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to trypan blue (Wasterlain and Posner, 1968) or Na' (Melton et al, 1987). The integrity of the BBB was not measured in the present series of experiments, and although it has been observed that the BBB and the blood-CSF barrier may open in parallel when blood pressure is raised rapidly (Ziylan, 1984), there is no correlation between brain and CSF albumin after lesioning of the barriers with protamine sulfate (Westergren and Johansson, 1990). Regardless of whether plasma hypoosmolality opened the BBB or not, it is likely that the dialysis probe itself caused some barrier damage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Previous studies on the water intoxication model have not demonstrated increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to trypan blue (Wasterlain and Posner, 1968) or Na' (Melton et al, 1987). The integrity of the BBB was not measured in the present series of experiments, and although it has been observed that the BBB and the blood-CSF barrier may open in parallel when blood pressure is raised rapidly (Ziylan, 1984), there is no correlation between brain and CSF albumin after lesioning of the barriers with protamine sulfate (Westergren and Johansson, 1990). Regardless of whether plasma hypoosmolality opened the BBB or not, it is likely that the dialysis probe itself caused some barrier damage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%