2019
DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_48_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathophysiology of a scientific paper

Abstract: Scientific paper writing for science journals is highly adroit, competitive, and laborious process. Scientific writing has a constant design, which is confounding for apprentice science writers. The huge amount of impediments is associated with scientific writing which may be reduced by applying some practices and guidelines. The basic structure of scientific articles mainly comprises of the title, abstract, keywords, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, acknowledgments, and references. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific paper writing for science journals is a highly adroit, competitive, and laborious process. [ 7 ] The study strengths include the following:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scientific paper writing for science journals is a highly adroit, competitive, and laborious process. [ 7 ] The study strengths include the following:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this modern era of science and technology, authors, for example, undergraduates, postgraduate students, physicians, and research scholars, are fascinated by writing scientific articles as academic scientists. [ 7 ] Once an author found a possible journal to submit his/her article to, reading its aims and scope is recommended for a brief introduction to the journal. [ 8 , 9 ] The journal's aims and scope can be seen in the journal's name, but this is not always true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific paper writing for science journals is a highly adroit, competitive, and laborious process. [36] The study strengths include the following:comparing abstract mood in the 2 journals; extracting article topics from MeSH terms using SNA; drawing visual representations through SNA, choropleth map, and forest plots that can inspire other relevant research to replicate the approaches for other 2-paired journals in comparison in the future; and providing readers with an easy copy-paste method to draw forest plots online. [37] Importantly, numerous meta-analysis studies have applied Review Manager (RevMan) software in publications.…”
Section: Implications and Applications Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%