Pathophysiology and management of sensitive skin: position paper from the special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI)
Abstract:The special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch previously defined sensitive skin as a syndrome defined by the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (stinging, burning, pain, pruritus and tingling sensations) in response to stimuli that normally should not provoke such sensations. This additional paper focuses on the pathophysiology and the management of sensitive skin. Sensitive skin is not an immunological disorder but is related to alterations of the skin nervous … Show more
“…Patients who report a presumed allergy to cosmetics may in fact suffer from “sensitive skin.” This is a separate entity defined as “the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (stinging, burning, pain, pruritus and tingling sensations) in response to stimuli that normally should not provoke such sensations.” 2 It is not immunologically driven and should not be confused with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD).…”
Background
There is considerable variability across European patch test centres as to which allergens are included in local and national cosmetics series.
Objectives
To propose a standardized, evidence‐based cosmetic series for Europe based on up‐to‐date analysis of relevant contact allergens.
Methods
We collated data from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) from 2009 to 2018 to determine which cosmetic allergens produce a high yield of contact allergy. Contact allergens with a prevalence of >0.3% that were considered relevant were included. Rare contact allergens were excluded if deemed no longer relevant or added to a supplemental cosmetic series for further analysis.
Results
Sensitization prevalences of 39 cosmetic contact allergens were tabulated. Thirty of these allergens yielded >0.3% positive reactions and are therefore included in our proposed European cosmetic series. Six were considered no longer relevant and therefore excluded. Three were included in a supplementary European cosmetic series. An additional nine allergens were included in either the core or supplemental European cosmetic series following literature review.
Conclusion
We have derived a potential European cosmetic series based upon the above methods. This will require ongoing investigation based upon the changing exposure profiles of cosmetic allergens as well as new and evolving substances.
“…Patients who report a presumed allergy to cosmetics may in fact suffer from “sensitive skin.” This is a separate entity defined as “the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (stinging, burning, pain, pruritus and tingling sensations) in response to stimuli that normally should not provoke such sensations.” 2 It is not immunologically driven and should not be confused with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD).…”
Background
There is considerable variability across European patch test centres as to which allergens are included in local and national cosmetics series.
Objectives
To propose a standardized, evidence‐based cosmetic series for Europe based on up‐to‐date analysis of relevant contact allergens.
Methods
We collated data from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) from 2009 to 2018 to determine which cosmetic allergens produce a high yield of contact allergy. Contact allergens with a prevalence of >0.3% that were considered relevant were included. Rare contact allergens were excluded if deemed no longer relevant or added to a supplemental cosmetic series for further analysis.
Results
Sensitization prevalences of 39 cosmetic contact allergens were tabulated. Thirty of these allergens yielded >0.3% positive reactions and are therefore included in our proposed European cosmetic series. Six were considered no longer relevant and therefore excluded. Three were included in a supplementary European cosmetic series. An additional nine allergens were included in either the core or supplemental European cosmetic series following literature review.
Conclusion
We have derived a potential European cosmetic series based upon the above methods. This will require ongoing investigation based upon the changing exposure profiles of cosmetic allergens as well as new and evolving substances.
“…A systematic review of the literature showed that the levels of epidermal pH, sebum production and skin hydration were inconsistent [53]. Consequently, dry skin and sensitive can be associated, but sensitive skin cannot be reduced to being a manifestation of dry skin, and its management does not consist of the only application of emollients [12]. Nonetheless, it does not mean that there is no role of keratinocytes in sensitive skin and there are complex interactions between neurons and keratinocytes in sensitive skin [54].…”
Section: Arguments For Neuro-keratinocytic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFSI special interest group on sensitive skin published a position paper on the pathophysiology and management of sensitive skin [12]. A multifactorial origin was suggested after the discussion of many putative mechanisms.…”
Sensitive skin can be considered a neuropathic disorder. Sensory disorders and the decrease in intra-epidermal nerve ending density are strong arguments for small-fiber neuropathies. Sensitive skin is frequently associated with irritable bowel syndrome or sensitive eyes, which are also considered neuropathic disorders. Consequently, in vitro co-cultures of skin and neurons are adequate models for sensitive skin.
“…Sensitive skin affects approximately half of the population and is more frequent in women than in men (2,3). The pathophysiological mechanisms have been debated, and several hypotheses exist (4). Sensitive skin can be considered a result of a decrease in the skin tolerance threshold, which thereby impairs barrier function and leads to abnormalities in the cutaneous nervous system, making the skin hyperreactive (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathophysiological mechanisms have been debated, and several hypotheses exist (4). Sensitive skin can be considered a result of a decrease in the skin tolerance threshold, which thereby impairs barrier function and leads to abnormalities in the cutaneous nervous system, making the skin hyperreactive (4)(5)(6). Sensitive skin can therefore be the clinical expression of neurogenic inflammation and can be modulated by many factors (7).…”
A sensitive scalp is defined by the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (tingling, burning, pain, pruritus) triggered by stimuli that should not cause such sensations. Environmental factors, particularly cosmetics, can be triggering factors. The aims of this study were to assess hair cosmetic product consumption in subjects with sensitive scalp and to perform a clinical evaluation of sensitive scalp. After a dermatological examination, women between the ages of 18 and 65 years with or without a sensitive scalp completed different questionnaires. Their use of hair cosmetics (frequency, amount per application) was recorded. A total of 160 women with a mean age of 41 years were included. Twenty-seven subjects presented with seborrheic dermatitis or psoriasis, so only 133 were included in the analysis. Five percent of the subjects declared they had a very sensitive scalp, 25% had a sensitive scalp, 38% had a slightly sensitive scalp, and 32% had a scalp that was not sensitive. The mean sensitive scalp score (3S) score was 3.7 ± 1.6 in the very sensitive scalp group, 3.6 ± 2.1 in the sensitive group, 1.2 ± 1.2 in the slightly sensitive group and 0.1 ± 0.4 in the non-sensitive group. Two groups were analyzed: the 56 subjects with a sensitive scalp (3S ≥ 2 score) and the 56 subjects with a null 3S score. In the sensitive scalp group, 89% suffered from itch, and 45% suffered from tingling. No parameter (hormonal status, smoking, age, phototype, BMI) was associated with the 3S score. No differences in the exposure to shampoos and masks between the two groups were noted. The exposure to hair conditioners was significantly higher in the sensitive scalp group than in the group without sensitive scalp. Itch is the main symptom of a sensitive scalp. The frequency of a sensitive scalp was lower than that previously described when the subjects with scalp dermatosis were excluded. The amount of hair conditioners used was significantly higher in subjects with sensitive scalp than in those without sensitive scalp, suggesting a possible link.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.