ABSTRACT:The glycine receptor is an anion-permeable member of the Cys-loop ion channel receptor family. Synaptic glycine receptors predominantly comprise pentameric α1β subunit heteromers. To date, attempts to define the subunit stoichiometry and arrangement of these receptors have not yielded consistent results. Here we introduced FLAG and 6-His epitopes into α1 and β subunits, respectively, and imaged single antibody-bound α1β receptors using atomic force microscopy. This permitted us to infer the number and relative locations of the respective subunits in functional pentamers. Our results indicate an invariant stoichiometry of 2α1:3β with a subunit arrangement of β−α−β−α−β.Glycine receptor (GlyR) chloride channels mediate inhibitory transmission in the spinal cord and brain stem 1 . As they are considered potential therapeutic targets for indications including inflammatory pain, hyperekplexia, spasticity, tinnitus and breathing disorders [2][3][4][5] , there is widespread interest in understanding the molecular structure of their ligand binding sites for therapeutic development. GlyRs are members of the pentameric Cys-loop ion channel receptor family. Because ligandbinding sites are located at subunit interfaces, the pharmacological properties of each binding site are defined by the contributing subunits 6 . It is thus of interest to establish the subunits stoichiometry and arrangement in functional receptors to determine the number and type of subunit interfaces. Synaptic GlyRs are αβ heteromers, and receptors resulting from the cotransfection of varying amounts of α and β subunit RNA have uniform functional properties, implying a fixed stoichiometry 7,8 . Depending on their stoichiometry, heteromeric GlyRs may contain a mixture of α−α, α−β, β−α and β−β interfaces.The initial characterization of affinity-purified native GlyRs inferred that heteromeric GlyRs comprised 3α and 2β subunits 9,10 . This stoichiometry was supported by a subsequent functional analysis that showed the effect of a pore mutation was more dramatic when inserted into the α relative to the β subunit, implying an excess of α subunits per pentamer 11 . However, a study that compared the effects of mutations to corresponding glycine binding residues in α1 and β subunits concluded that β subunits predominated in α1β GlyRs 12 . They then showed that α1-β concatemers produced functional heteromers when co-expressed with β monomers but not when expressed alone or with α1 monomers. This was consistent with either a 2α:3β or a 1α:4β stoichiometry. Quantitation of radio-labeled methionine levels in recombinant α1 and α1β GlyRs allowed the authors to deduce a 2α1:3β stoichiometry, with an arrangement of β−α−β−α−β 12 .However, potential problems with using concatemers include dimer proteolysis 13 , dipentamer formation 14 and incomplete incorporation of fusion protein into individual pentamers 15 . These problems are more likely to occur when dimers are co-transfected with monomers than when fully concatenated pentamers are used 16,17 . Thus, as the ...