2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5040-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathological sulcus vocalis: treatment approaches and voice outcomes in 36 patients

Abstract: PurposeThis is a retrospective study to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of patients with pathological sulcus vocalis.MethodsThirty-six patients with pathological sulcus underwent surgery and in 33 cases were performed additional injection laryngoplasty. The pre- and postoperative evaluation of patients included the GRBAS scale, stroboscopic, and objective acoustic voice assessment. The Voice Handicap Index questionnaire (VHI-30) was also used and the scores were obtained from 33 patients.ResultsThe … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of improvement in the degree of roughness (R) may indicate that, in this sample, the gradation of the general grade of vocal deviation (G) decreased due to the reduction in the degree of deviation from other parameters on the GRBASI scale, such as, for example, tension and breathiness. 9,28,29,35 In addition, it is believed that the reduced number of individuals per pathology available for pre-and post-treatment comparison has also contributed to the lack of evidence of improvement in the degree of roughness of individuals in this sample. In general, it was possible to identify the improvement in vocal quality after treatment application, regardless of the subtype presented and the treatment performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of improvement in the degree of roughness (R) may indicate that, in this sample, the gradation of the general grade of vocal deviation (G) decreased due to the reduction in the degree of deviation from other parameters on the GRBASI scale, such as, for example, tension and breathiness. 9,28,29,35 In addition, it is believed that the reduced number of individuals per pathology available for pre-and post-treatment comparison has also contributed to the lack of evidence of improvement in the degree of roughness of individuals in this sample. In general, it was possible to identify the improvement in vocal quality after treatment application, regardless of the subtype presented and the treatment performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the general impact of dysphonia, it is noted that only 8.1 and 7.4% of all subjects had, respectively, general degree and degree of roughness classified as extreme, regardless of the subtype of MSAC (►Table 2), confirming that the percentage of subjects classified with severe dysphonia in the auditory-perceptual analysis is reduced in the most common subtypes of MSAC. 9,28,29,35 Speech therapy treatment was performed at least 50% of the time in all subtypes of MSAC (►Table 3). It is worth mentioning then that the benefits brought by this therapy and the treatment phase in which it is most indicated are controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also significant improvement in the grade, roughness and breathiness of the GRBAS score, glottal closure and mucosal wave amplitude of the stroboscopic findings, and in most of the aerodynamic and acoustic parameters [ 29 ]. Miaskiewicz recently showed an improvement in the VHI-30 of 10.2 points (preoperative 44.36 versus postoperative 34.12) at 12 months after combined sulcus excision and VFI, using a short-acting filler in 29 cases, a long-acting filler in 2, a combination of fillers in 2, and no filler in 3 cases [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their different surgical approaches to treat sulcus, the studies above show statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in VHI scores, although these are still above normal [ 27 , 29 , 30 , 34 ]. It is important to note that these results are in line with our results from treating sulcus with autologous fat injection only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, Miaśkiewicz et al 17 mentioned improvement in all parameters (glottal closure, mucosal wave, and amplitude) after sulcus vocalis injection. The author underwent surgical excision of fibrous bands, followed by VF injection augmentation.…”
Section: Voice Handicap Indexmentioning
confidence: 98%