2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathological OCT Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Branch Residual U-Shape Networks

Abstract: The automatic segmentation of retinal layer structures enables clinically-relevant quantification and monitoring of eye disorders over time in OCT imaging. Eyes with late-stage diseases are particularly challenging to segment, as their shape is highly warped due to pathological biomarkers. In this context, we propose a novel fully-Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture which combines dilated residual blocks in an asymmetric U-shape configuration, and can segment multiple layers of highly pathological … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a formal definition of an ensemble, the interested reader could refer to Supplementary Material Section 1. Given a set of manually annotated B-scans, we trained four different U-shaped FCNN models: three of them are inspired in the U-Net 18 , the BRU-Net 19 and the All-Dropout 20 architectures, while the fourth one corresponds to our U2-Net 21 . The U-Net was selected due to its standard design, whereas the BRU-Net was chosen based on its performance for retinal layer segmentation in pathological OCT scans.…”
Section: Manual Annotation Protocol and Data Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a formal definition of an ensemble, the interested reader could refer to Supplementary Material Section 1. Given a set of manually annotated B-scans, we trained four different U-shaped FCNN models: three of them are inspired in the U-Net 18 , the BRU-Net 19 and the All-Dropout 20 architectures, while the fourth one corresponds to our U2-Net 21 . The U-Net was selected due to its standard design, whereas the BRU-Net was chosen based on its performance for retinal layer segmentation in pathological OCT scans.…”
Section: Manual Annotation Protocol and Data Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the feature learning ability of U-Net, some new modules have been proposed to replace the original blocks. Stefanos et al [48] proposed a branch residual U-network (BRU-net) to segment pathological OCT retinal layer for agerelated macular degeneration diagnosis. BRU-net relies on residual connection and dilated convolutions to enhance the final OCT retinal layer segmentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With dense connections, each layer is connected to all its preceding layers by feature map concatenation, allowing discernible features of faint boundaries to be retrieved across multiple scales. But, this comes at a cost of increased computation [22,23], and we empirically determined that a densely connected network at a depth of 6 levels provides a good balance between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency [14,23]. Additionally, max pooling was better at maintaining features of interest through the network over average pooling and convolutions of stride 2 [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%