2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10801-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathological neural networks and artificial neural networks in ALS: diagnostic classification based on pathognomonic neuroimaging features

Abstract: The description of group-level, genotype- and phenotype-associated imaging traits is academically important, but the practical demands of clinical neurology centre on the accurate classification of individual patients into clinically relevant diagnostic, prognostic and phenotypic categories. Similarly, pharmaceutical trials require the precision stratification of participants based on quantitative measures. A single-centre study was conducted with a uniform imaging protocol to test the accuracy of an artificia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(90 reference statements)
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain anatomical areas such as the parietal lobes and occipital lobe may not be characteristic regions of degeneration, yet, as illustrated, may have a role in segregating specific ALS subtypes. This observation is consistent with the emerging machine-learning literature of ALS [ 52 , 53 ] which suggests that feature importance analyses, especially in multi-class classification schemes, may identify brain regions which are not classically associated with ALS [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Certain anatomical areas such as the parietal lobes and occipital lobe may not be characteristic regions of degeneration, yet, as illustrated, may have a role in segregating specific ALS subtypes. This observation is consistent with the emerging machine-learning literature of ALS [ 52 , 53 ] which suggests that feature importance analyses, especially in multi-class classification schemes, may identify brain regions which are not classically associated with ALS [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is, with respect to an AUC value of 0.91, an excellent result according to predefined criteria ( Mandrekar, 2010 ) in comparison to other applications of multiparametric MRI classifiers to ALS (review in Thome et al, 2022 ) and supports the use of CC as a neuroimaging marker in ALS. A recent study ( Bede et al, 2022A ) used a perceptron model to discriminate ALS, UMN predominant, and LMN predominant cohorts and found that measures of the forceps minor (anterior CC / fibres of the genu of CC) discriminate these subtypes rather well, in the same line like the results of the current study; approaches of neural network classification based on neuroimaging features have also been reported ( Bede et al, 2022B ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In conclusion, our results support the enormous academic and clinical potential of AI‐based approaches in ALS 19,47 . Cluster analysis of multimodal parameters associated with the respective criteria for staging in DTI, VOG, and cognitive testing displayed a high congruence of these approaches in patients with ALS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In conclusion, our results support the enormous academic and clinical potential of AI-based approaches in ALS. 19,47 Cluster analysis of multimodal parameters associated with the respective criteria for staging in DTI, VOG, and cognitive testing displayed a high congruence of these approaches in patients with ALS. The combination of measures of structural changes in diffusionweighted MRI with measures of cognition and oculomotor function was capable of assessing neuropathological stages 1 and 4 in particular and could provide the basis for a future multimodal extension of the in vivo staging system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%