2009
DOI: 10.1080/03079450903349162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathological and immunohistochemical study of chickens with co-infection of Marek's disease virus and chicken anaemia virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Monoclonal antibodies were diluted to predetermined optimal dilutions in Dako REAL TM antibody diluent (Tris buffer, pH 7.2, containing 15 mmol/l NaN 3, protein; Code S2022, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC) method for immunoperoxidase staining was carried out to detect CAV antigen [9]. Slides were covered with antiserum to CAV diluted 1:100 in a humid chamber at 4°C overnight and then incubated with biotinylated goat anti-chicken IgG (Vector Labs, Peterborough, England) diluted 1:100 in PBS for 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monoclonal antibodies were diluted to predetermined optimal dilutions in Dako REAL TM antibody diluent (Tris buffer, pH 7.2, containing 15 mmol/l NaN 3, protein; Code S2022, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC) method for immunoperoxidase staining was carried out to detect CAV antigen [9]. Slides were covered with antiserum to CAV diluted 1:100 in a humid chamber at 4°C overnight and then incubated with biotinylated goat anti-chicken IgG (Vector Labs, Peterborough, England) diluted 1:100 in PBS for 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antiserum to CAV was raised as previously described [9] for detection of CAV antigen. The CT4 and CT8 monoclonal antibodies (Southern Biotechnology Associates Inc., Birmingham, AL, U.S.A.) were used to recognize chicken homologues of CD4 and CD8α, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, the morbidity and mortality were considerably enhanced when chicks are dually infected with CAV and MDV, REV, or infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), probably because of the virus-induced immunosuppression [29][30][31][32][33]. Table 1 showed the infection type of samples collected in 2015, out of all the 72 CAVpositive samples, there were 35 (48.6%) samples were detected as MDV positive (18 dual infection; 15 triple infection; 2 quadruple infection), but other viral pathogens showed a similar ratio that was not particularly high, therefore, meaning MDV and CAV were the most common co-infection type in this investigation, as believed that outbreaks of MD in birds most are linked with CAV co-infection [34], which should arouse more attention. It is known that with CAV infected commercial chickens, lymphocytic depletion of the bursa often leads to lymphocytic depletion of the thymus [35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…HGyV could not be detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples, nasopharyngeal aspirates, or fecal samples from children [16]. However, CAV infects a wide range of cell types and has been associated with the worsening of pathologies caused by other viral and bacterial agents [38,39,40]. The absence of HGyV genomes in the respiratory specimens (nasal and throat swabs) derived from adults with ILI and ARI in the present study supports the idea that HGyV may not replicate in the cells of the respiratory tract and may not be associated with respiratory diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%