2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/574540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathologic Assessment of Rectal Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Radio(chemo)therapy: Prognostic Implications

Abstract: Neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy is increasingly used in rectal cancer and induces a number of morphologic changes that affect prognostication after curative surgery, thereby creating new challenges for surgical pathologists, particularly in evaluating morphologic changes and tumour response to preoperative treatment. Surgical pathologists play an important role in determining the many facets of rectal carcinoma patient care after neoadjuvant treatment. These range from proper handling of macroscopic specimens … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the patients in the taTME group of the study by Perdawood et al [ 26 ] showed a obviously higher BMI when compared with those in the laTME group ( P = 0.07), the patients in the study of Hevia et al [ 28 ] showed a difference in age between the two groups ( P = 0.06), and the distance of tumor the above the anal verge showed a significant difference between groups in Chen’s study ( P = 0.02) [ 30 ]. Importantly, neoadjuvant treatments may be a potential confounding factor for the oncological outcomes of rectal cancer [ 48 ]. However, we could not conduct a subgroup analysis based on whether patients had received neoadjuvant treatments before surgical resection by all the possible means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the patients in the taTME group of the study by Perdawood et al [ 26 ] showed a obviously higher BMI when compared with those in the laTME group ( P = 0.07), the patients in the study of Hevia et al [ 28 ] showed a difference in age between the two groups ( P = 0.06), and the distance of tumor the above the anal verge showed a significant difference between groups in Chen’s study ( P = 0.02) [ 30 ]. Importantly, neoadjuvant treatments may be a potential confounding factor for the oncological outcomes of rectal cancer [ 48 ]. However, we could not conduct a subgroup analysis based on whether patients had received neoadjuvant treatments before surgical resection by all the possible means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBO with growth of fibrous and edematous tissue can occur as an adverse event during NAT. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer causes tumor regression by eradication and replacement of carcinoma cells by fibrous or fibroinflammatory tissues [ 8 ]. Previous studies have shown that patients with fibroinflammatory changes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have better disease-free survival [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…affect IHC staining, especially for MSH6, which may be absent, weak, or stain just the nucleoli. 33,34 In these cases, pretreatment biopsy, if available, may be more suitable for MSI testing. 4.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Therapy Especially In Rectal Cancers Maymentioning
confidence: 99%