2015
DOI: 10.2147/copd.s82752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogens in COPD exacerbations identified by comprehensive real-time PCR plus older methods

Abstract: Respiratory infection is a major cause of exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Infectious contributions to exacerbations remain incompletely described. We therefore analyzed respiratory tract samples by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in combination with conventional methods. We evaluated multiple risk factors for prolonged hospitalization to manage COPD exacerbations, including infectious agents. Over 19 months, we prospectively studied 46 patients with 50 COPD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
7
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comprehensive RT-PCR has been regarded as a method of choice for detection of the viruses in the respiratory specimens. [18] Combining real-time PCR with conventional methods improves the ability to detect infectious etiologies of COPD exacerbations including both bacteria and respiratory viruses and may emerge as the standard of care in facilities with capacity to do the testing. [18] Recently microarray-based etiology of AECOPD pathogens was carried out in 200 patients with AECOPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comprehensive RT-PCR has been regarded as a method of choice for detection of the viruses in the respiratory specimens. [18] Combining real-time PCR with conventional methods improves the ability to detect infectious etiologies of COPD exacerbations including both bacteria and respiratory viruses and may emerge as the standard of care in facilities with capacity to do the testing. [18] Recently microarray-based etiology of AECOPD pathogens was carried out in 200 patients with AECOPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] Combining real-time PCR with conventional methods improves the ability to detect infectious etiologies of COPD exacerbations including both bacteria and respiratory viruses and may emerge as the standard of care in facilities with capacity to do the testing. [18] Recently microarray-based etiology of AECOPD pathogens was carried out in 200 patients with AECOPD. Human RSV (subtypes A and B) (40.5%), influenza virus (subtypes A, B, C) (11%), rhinovirus (8%) and human parainfluenza virus (subtypes A and B) (7.5%) were the commonest isolated strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, we confirmed that the clinical efficacy ranged from 65.2% to 75.0% in a cohort with severe risk factors, and there were no severe adverse events. To date, the most significant causes of COPD exacerbations have been reported to be air pollution and respiratory tract infection, including infection by a virus (40%e60%) or by bacterium, such as H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, or M. catarrhalis [25,26]. The causative pathogens were isolated from only 11 patients (37.9%) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Double bacterial growth pattern in the present study was as follows: Klebsiella pneumoniae with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 4 cases, Klebsiella pneumoniae with Staphylococcus aureus in 2 cases, E. coli with coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 2 cases and Klebsiella pneumoniae with E. coli in 2 cases. Shimizu et al [32] observed in their study as S. pneumoniae in 8% AECOPD cases, H. influenzae 2% cases, double bacterial infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae and H. influenzae in 4% cases, and with P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in 2% cases. In a study done by Bari MR et al [31] out of the 90 sputum samples, double organisms like, Pseudomonas with Klebsiella in 2 cases and Pseudomonas with Acinetobacter in the 1 case were isolated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%