2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenicity reclassification of two BRCA1/BRCA2 exonic duplications after identification of genomic breakpoints and tandem orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The French OncoGenetics database (FrOG_db) reports duplication of BRCA1 exons 4 to 6 in 10 patients [ 15 ] but no information on the genomic orientation of these duplications is available. However, the genomic duplication of exons 4 to 6 has been described three times in the literature: in one patient referred to a French hospital [ 16 ], in one patient from Stanford (Chinese ethnicity) [ 17 ], and in another patient studied in a Portuguese hospital [ 18 ]. The breakpoints were mapped in all three cases and matched to three distinct pairs of Alu elements, which is not surprising, since both introns 3 and 5 are long—intron 3 is the longest BRCA1 intron (9192 bp)—and contain numerous Alu repeats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The French OncoGenetics database (FrOG_db) reports duplication of BRCA1 exons 4 to 6 in 10 patients [ 15 ] but no information on the genomic orientation of these duplications is available. However, the genomic duplication of exons 4 to 6 has been described three times in the literature: in one patient referred to a French hospital [ 16 ], in one patient from Stanford (Chinese ethnicity) [ 17 ], and in another patient studied in a Portuguese hospital [ 18 ]. The breakpoints were mapped in all three cases and matched to three distinct pairs of Alu elements, which is not surprising, since both introns 3 and 5 are long—intron 3 is the longest BRCA1 intron (9192 bp)—and contain numerous Alu repeats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%