2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1742758414000605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenicity and performance of two candidate isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) in four liquid culture media for the management of the legume pod borer Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Abstract: Pathogenicity and performance of two candidate isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) in four liquid culture media for the management of the legume pod borer Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)Abstract. The aim of this study was to identify and develop entomopathogenic fungi as biopesticides for management of Maruca vitrata (Fabricius). Fourteen isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) Sorokin and six of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
12
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results obtained in M. anisopliae ICIPE 18 (100% larval mortality) are also similar to the results of Tumuhaise et al. (2015), who demonstrated that the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), was highly susceptible to this fungal isolate, causing 91% first instar larval mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results obtained in M. anisopliae ICIPE 18 (100% larval mortality) are also similar to the results of Tumuhaise et al. (2015), who demonstrated that the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), was highly susceptible to this fungal isolate, causing 91% first instar larval mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other laboratory studies have also reported high susceptibility of T. absoluta larval (Mantzoukas, Denaxa, & Lagogiannis, 2019;Tadele & Emana, 2017) and egg stage (Pires, Marques, Oliveira, & Alves, 2010;Rodriguez, Gerding, & France, 2006a) to M. anisopliae. Our results obtained in M. anisopliae ICIPE 18 (100% larval mortality) are also similar to the results of Tumuhaise et al (2015), who demonstrated that the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There was no significant difference in S. recurvalis larval mortality (Inglis et al, 2001;Maniania, 1992), our findings showed that S. recurvalis is moderately susceptible to the same fungal isolate. In addition, these results are opposite to Tumuhaise et al (2015) who demonstrated that the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), was highly susceptible to M. anisopliae ICIPE 18 that caused 91% larval mortality, S. recurvalis larvae were less susceptible to ICIPE 18 with only 6.7% mortality recorded. The mode of action of EPF involves conidial attachment to the host surface followed by germination and penetration of the host cuticle through a combination of enzymatic activity and mechanical force (Arruda, Lübeck, Schrank, & Vainstein, 2005;Inglis et al, 2012;Quintela & McCoy, 1998).…”
Section: Interactions Between Metarhizium Anisopliae Isolate Icipe contrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The majority of arthropod pathogenic strains belong to M. anisopliae, and include M. anisopliae strain ICIPE 18 (against T. absoluta, Maruca vitrata, C. partellus and B. fusca) (Maniania, 1993), M. anisopliae strain ICIPE 20 (against T. absoluta and S. frugiperda and the pea leafminer Liriomyza huidobrensis) (Migiro et al, 2010;Mohamed et al, 2017;Akutse et al, 2019a), M. anisopliae strains ICIPE 40, ICIPE 41, ICIPE 315 and ICIPE 655 (against S. frugiperda) (Akutse et al, 2019a), M. anisopliae strain ICIPE 30 (against the amaranth leaf webber Spoladea recurvalis (Opisa et al, 2018(Opisa et al, , 2019; the stemborers C. partellus and B. fusca (Maniania, 1993); the mosquitoes A. gambiae and A. aegypti; the tsetse flies G. morsitans morsitans, G. fuscipes fuscipes and G. pallidipes; and the sand flies Phlebotomus martini and P. duboscqi) (Ngumbi et al, 2011;Ngure et al, 2015); and M. anisopliae strain ICIPE 51 (against the termite Macrotermes michaelseni) (Mburu et al, 2009(Mburu et al, , 2013. In addition, strains that already have been commercialized are being tested against others pests: M. anisopliae strains ICIPE 7 and ICIPE 78 against S. frugiperda (Akutse et al, 2019a); and M. anisopliae strain ICIPE 69 against T. leucotreta (Mkiga et al, 2020) and M. vitrata (Tumuhaise et al, 2015(Tumuhaise et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Biopesticides In the Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%