2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenic bacteria and mineral N in soils following the land spreading of biogas digestates and fresh manure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effects on single treatment and handling steps differentiate (e.g., manure handling, manure storage, field spreading) and are strongly dependent on the design of Derived from results in greenhouse or growth chamber pot experiments (Goberna et al 2011;Sänger et al 2010Sänger et al , 2011Walsh et al 2012a) or from theoretical approaches (Ørtenblad 2002;Dalgaard et al 2004), it is often hypothesized that the nitrate leaching risk after field spreading of digestates is lower than after spreading of the undigested manure. The statements are deducted from the assumed better match of N supply and crop N demand, as a consequence of the higher ammonium-N/ total N share in digestates compared to the input feedstocks.…”
Section: Effects Of Anaerobic Digestion On Digestate Organic Matter Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effects on single treatment and handling steps differentiate (e.g., manure handling, manure storage, field spreading) and are strongly dependent on the design of Derived from results in greenhouse or growth chamber pot experiments (Goberna et al 2011;Sänger et al 2010Sänger et al , 2011Walsh et al 2012a) or from theoretical approaches (Ørtenblad 2002;Dalgaard et al 2004), it is often hypothesized that the nitrate leaching risk after field spreading of digestates is lower than after spreading of the undigested manure. The statements are deducted from the assumed better match of N supply and crop N demand, as a consequence of the higher ammonium-N/ total N share in digestates compared to the input feedstocks.…”
Section: Effects Of Anaerobic Digestion On Digestate Organic Matter Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of other phytotoxic substances, such as volatile fatty acids (i.e., acetic, propionic and butyric acids), as well as the high content of soluble salts may contribute to the slurry phytotoxicity [125]. Furthermore, Goberna et al [126] found that amending soils with slurry resulted in greater nitrate losses during the first 30 d of a 100 d incubation period in 20 cm-depth lysimeters. In fact, around 23 and 45% of the total N contained in the soil (natural + added) was lost from soils amended with cattle manure and anaerobic slurry, respectively.…”
Section: Influence Of Anaerobic Digested Slurry On the Soil Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lapen et al [14], and Gottschall et al [15] monitored tile-and ground-water quality for bacteria (Escherichia coli, enterococci, Clostridium perfringens) after land application of dewatered biosolids (using both spreading and surface injection application methods), and they found that there were no significant differences between using different methods of spreading biosolids, also they measured the concentration of the E. coli contamination in ground water.…”
Section: Association Of Biosolids and Manure Application With Microbimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed microbial concentration with distances and sampling heights for different weather conditions (wind velocity and direction, relative humidity and temperature) to develop empirical fate and transport models. These studies have generally focused on estimating risk of microbial infection from one medium only [14,[100][101][102]108]. However, different environmental compartments (i.e.…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation