1965
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-196503000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenetic Classification of Portal Hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, between 1969 and 1984, 45% of patients reported with PISVT initially presented with GI bleeding 7 . Similarly, removing the limit on study age in the literature included in this analysis yields an overall PISVT incidence of 14.1% (22.6% in AP and 12.4% in CP) and a bleed rate of 19.0% 2,3,6,7,9,11–14,17–45 . A comparison of these data with results reported in the current review indicates both an increasing awareness of PISVT and a decreasing concern for GI bleed in the era of universal cross‐sectional imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, between 1969 and 1984, 45% of patients reported with PISVT initially presented with GI bleeding 7 . Similarly, removing the limit on study age in the literature included in this analysis yields an overall PISVT incidence of 14.1% (22.6% in AP and 12.4% in CP) and a bleed rate of 19.0% 2,3,6,7,9,11–14,17–45 . A comparison of these data with results reported in the current review indicates both an increasing awareness of PISVT and a decreasing concern for GI bleed in the era of universal cross‐sectional imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…After duplicates had been removed and the exclusion criteria noted in Table 2 applied, 47 clinical studies and 52 case reports were graded as relevant; these referred to a cohort of 805 distinct patients with PISVT. Thirty‐eight references were assessed as eligible for quantitative inclusion by the reviewers 2,3,6,7,9,11–14,17–45 . The median CEBM level of included studies was 2A 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%