2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2020.100974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogen life-cycle leaves footprint on the spatial distribution of recruitment of their host plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraspecific processes, such as resource competition or density‐dependent enemies, are weaker when densities are lower and when plants are farther away from conspecific adults (Bagchi et al., 2010; Connell, 1971; Janzen, 1970; Le Roux et al., 2013; Perea et al., 2020). Lower densities in seed clusters reduce distance‐ and density‐dependent mortality, leading to weaker levels of spatial self‐thinning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Intraspecific processes, such as resource competition or density‐dependent enemies, are weaker when densities are lower and when plants are farther away from conspecific adults (Bagchi et al., 2010; Connell, 1971; Janzen, 1970; Le Roux et al., 2013; Perea et al., 2020). Lower densities in seed clusters reduce distance‐ and density‐dependent mortality, leading to weaker levels of spatial self‐thinning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…foraging activity and scape hypothesis; Howe, 1989; Russo et al., 2006; Verdú & García‐Fayos, 1996). Conversely, seeds of dry‐fruited species are usually highly aggregated due to wind, gravity or scatter hoarding, which enhance the strength of density‐dependent mechanisms and the spatial self‐thinning, especially if they are deposited close to the mother plant (Beckman et al., 2012; Bell et al., 2006; Nathan & Muller‐Landau, 2000; Perea et al., 2020). Indeed, we found that the neighbourhood density of saplings of fleshy‐fruited species was on average 0.843 saplings/m 2 , less than half that of dry‐fruited species (1.958 saplings/m 2 ), while thinning was on average five times stronger in dry‐fruited than in fleshy‐fruited species (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations