2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccas.2015.7364969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path planning algorithm to minimize an overlapped path and turning number for an underwater mining robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…work e f f iciency = overall travel time f or the normal scenario overall travel time f or the breakdown scenario (11) Another method of quantifying real-time scheduling can be defined. This is called recovery efficiency, and it can be formulated in Equation (12). The recovery efficiency quantifies how optimal the breakdown paths are in comparison to the paths planned for the normal scenario.…”
Section: Computation Time Area Coverage and Work Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…work e f f iciency = overall travel time f or the normal scenario overall travel time f or the breakdown scenario (11) Another method of quantifying real-time scheduling can be defined. This is called recovery efficiency, and it can be formulated in Equation (12). The recovery efficiency quantifies how optimal the breakdown paths are in comparison to the paths planned for the normal scenario.…”
Section: Computation Time Area Coverage and Work Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having such a high recovery efficiency means that the proposed methods can create paths that are comparable to the ones originally planned. recovery e f f iciency = total travel time f or the normal scenario total travel time f or the breakdown scenario (12) Since the lower-level path generation used to pre-process the service paths for each sub-area, the area coverage remains the same for any scenario and is independent of the performance of the higher-level path generation. The area coverage for each sub-area can be seen in Table 6, where all sub-area coverages are over 94%, and the average area coverage is 99.23%.…”
Section: Computation Time Area Coverage and Work Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DFS fails in infinite depth spaces and does not guarantee to find an optimal solution (shortest coverage path), whereas the BFS consumes large memory space due to the high branching factor in the search space. The DFS optimizes the sequence path with the benefit of minimum overlapped and several turns for CPP [156,157,158]. Kabir et al [159] utilized the DFS technique to create a cleaning trajectory by generating a sequence of setups.…”
Section: ) Depth-first Search and Breadth-first Search Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dr. Jing-ni Yuan from Shanghai Jiao Tong University proposed an improved vehicle motion planning method combining RRT* and Bessel curve control point optimization, but it is not suitable for deep-sea environment [3] . The Korean scholar Sup-hong et al deduced that the angular velocity during turning should be limited to 0.043rad/s [4,5,6,7] .Changsha Institute of Mining Research co. LTD., after the mining truck maritime test, concluded that the speed of the seabed mining truck should be controlled at 0.5m/s-1m/s. Considering that there is no sharp turn in obstacle avoidance, the actual turning distance is slightly larger than that of the idealized model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%