2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/indin.2013.6622857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path loss exponent analysis in Wireless Sensor Networks: Experimental evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7b. This is expected, as the free space path loss exponent is known to be 2 [26]. Similarly, C is calculated to be C = −65.24 with 95% confidence bound between (−66.74, −63.74) and C = −88.78 with 95% confidence bound between (−90.7, −86.87), for the indoor and outdoor environments, respectively.…”
Section: B Path Loss Modelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…7b. This is expected, as the free space path loss exponent is known to be 2 [26]. Similarly, C is calculated to be C = −65.24 with 95% confidence bound between (−66.74, −63.74) and C = −88.78 with 95% confidence bound between (−90.7, −86.87), for the indoor and outdoor environments, respectively.…”
Section: B Path Loss Modelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The v term is the path-loss exponent and takes values between 2 and 6. 37 The v term is set to 2 for the performance analysis. This is also a reasonable system model assumption.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The d term is the distance and the v term is the path-loss exponent, which takes values between 2 and 6. 37 By defining Ω h = 1 d v and Ω g = 1 (1−d) v and substituting these terms into the derived asymptotic CDF expressions, (18) is utilized, the following expressions can be obtained. Please note that, since the CDF expressions, which are related to one-way information exchange process, in Proposition 1 do not contain the information regarding S 2 → j th untrustworthy relay terminal path, the two-way information exchange CDF derivations are utilized in this subsection.…”
Section: The Untrustworthy Relay Terminals' Optimum Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may lead to suboptimal solution as path losses in free space would be quite different as compared to factories and automation environments. Path loss exponent is a measure of how fast the signal attenuates as a function of distance, is different for these environments in which the CR network would be deployed for which the values are given in Table 1 [14]. This paper investigates power control in CR within these different environments and focuses in the underlay scenario where the PUs and SUs transmit simultaneously in the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%