2013 5th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icumt.2013.6798403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path geo-diversification: Design and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we evaluate the proposed heuristics and compare their performance with the two-step algorithm [14]. We present the geodiverse paths calculated by our heuristics using the Nobel-EU (Pan-European Reference Network) with 28 nodes and 40 links [45].…”
Section: Real Network Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we evaluate the proposed heuristics and compare their performance with the two-step algorithm [14]. We present the geodiverse paths calculated by our heuristics using the Nobel-EU (Pan-European Reference Network) with 28 nodes and 40 links [45].…”
Section: Real Network Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proves that different locations in the physical network have varying contribution to the overall network connectivity [13]. It has also been observed that area-based challenges can cause a large number of failures in a geographical region and give rise to catastrophic damage to network communications [14]. Numerous events have demonstrated that area-based challenges can be modelled as a circular area with a certain challenge radius.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While fault-tolerance requires only redundant components and paths, survivability to correlated failures requires diversity in multiple dimensions: geographic path and medium. Thus, not only should each path be provided by distinct service providers, these paths must be diverse, both in avoiding the use of shared components [55], [56] as well as geographically [56], [57].…”
Section: Multiprovider Multilevel Survivability Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we can design and deploy ResTP without the support of service providers, a geodiverse routing protocol has two components. An intradomain routing protocol such as GeoDivRP can be deployed unilaterally by a service provider, by adding geolocation of routers to link state routing and a heuristic for creating geographically diverse paths [57], [64] using the cross-layering shown in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Multiprovider Multilevel Survivability Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%