2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path generation and optimization for DBB measurement with continuous data capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the controller, two local coordinate systems for the DBB measurement are defined; one locating at the nominal position of the middle point of the three-point fixture and one at the nominal position of the middle ball of the measuring paths, which is about 60 mm underneath the steel plate. For the measurement, 3 spherical paths are generated and optimised with a nominal radius of 300 mm for the spatial DBB measurement by applying the path generation approach, as described in [21,22]. The paths are visualized in Figure 13; in order from left to right, they are denoted by p1, p2, p3.…”
Section: Positioning Accuracy and Printing Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the controller, two local coordinate systems for the DBB measurement are defined; one locating at the nominal position of the middle point of the three-point fixture and one at the nominal position of the middle ball of the measuring paths, which is about 60 mm underneath the steel plate. For the measurement, 3 spherical paths are generated and optimised with a nominal radius of 300 mm for the spatial DBB measurement by applying the path generation approach, as described in [21,22]. The paths are visualized in Figure 13; in order from left to right, they are denoted by p1, p2, p3.…”
Section: Positioning Accuracy and Printing Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and 𝐣 is a row vector describing the amplification of the perturbations. The relationship could be derived either analytically or numerically by using approaches such as finite difference and algorithmic differentiation [17].…”
Section: Kinematic Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a scale of 20 µm, by 50 times interpolation and 4 times evaluation a resolution of 0.1 µm and accuracy of 1 µm is realised [6]. [6,16,17] Next, the measurement of elasto-static errors, as pose deviations due to the compliance of the robot and its components, shall be discussed. In order to evaluate the compliance of the robot and its components, the deviation of the end-effector pose must be measured in load situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables calibration in the entire working space of the machine without violating the small measuring range of currently available DBB [4]. Such a measuring device with strategies for the fast evaluation of the volumetric motion accuracy of a multi-axis kinematic system has been developed as part of previous research projects [2] [5] [6]. This extended DBB (Figure 2) fulfils the required suitability of a measuring system within the scope of the new approach of calibration as a digital service and can easily be mounted in the machine tool (Figure 3).…”
Section: Extended Dbb As Measuring Devicementioning
confidence: 99%