2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path following techniques for geometrically nonlinear structures based on Multi-point methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the basic idea of IAMS is similar to path following methods (PFM) or numerical continuation, which are well-developed in solving nonlinear ODE equations, nonlinear eigenvalue problems [44] and bifurcation problems [45]. In particular, PFMs are also widely used to solve engineering problems such as quasi-static nonlinear structural [46] and fracture problems [47,48] through finite element methods (FEM). It is known that FEM is usually solved by Newton-Raphson method with available Hessian matrix, while MS simulations need to search local energy minima with million or even billion degree of freedoms [38].…”
Section: Comparison With Path Following Methods and The Significance ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the basic idea of IAMS is similar to path following methods (PFM) or numerical continuation, which are well-developed in solving nonlinear ODE equations, nonlinear eigenvalue problems [44] and bifurcation problems [45]. In particular, PFMs are also widely used to solve engineering problems such as quasi-static nonlinear structural [46] and fracture problems [47,48] through finite element methods (FEM). It is known that FEM is usually solved by Newton-Raphson method with available Hessian matrix, while MS simulations need to search local energy minima with million or even billion degree of freedoms [38].…”
Section: Comparison With Path Following Methods and The Significance ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second example structure consists of a shallow cylindrical shell, which has been used as a benchmark problem in a number of similar studies. [45][46][47][48] Its geometric parameters, as specified in Figure 7, are the length L = 508 mm, the radius R = 2540 mm, the shell thickness t = 6.35 mm, and the section angle = 0.1 rad. The material parameters are Young's modulus E = 3.10275 kN/mm 2 and Poisson's ratio = 0.3.…”
Section: Shallow Cylindrical Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, comparability of the Abaqus result with the result of our adaptive framework is based on the comparability of the total number of points on the path produced by both path following methods, that is, 27 in our adaptive framework VS 29 in Abaqus. The right hand column of Table 6 reports the corresponding length ratio r i between consecutive prediction phases defined in (47). We observe that within the first six steps, the automatic incrementation method in Abaqus increases the step length to the maximum length L max = 4L 1 .…”
Section: Our Adaptive Framework Abaqusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, MIP Newton method can be well applied to high slenderness structures. Because of the importance of nonlinear solvers with respect to computational mechanics and their wide application, many solvers have been proposed to reduce number of iterations per load step and computation as the following: optimization-based iterative technique 6 and residual areas-based iterative technique, 7 dynamic relaxation techniques, [8][9][10] multipoint methods-based path following techniques, 11 a novel method to transform the discretized governing equations, 12 a data-driven nonlinear solver (DDNS), 13 an improved predictor-corrector method, 14 Koiter-Newton method with a superior performance for nonlinear analyses of structures, 15,16 etc. It is observed that employing time series prediction to reduce number of iterations of nonlinear solvers is very rare except the DDNS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%