2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path design and compression behavior of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composite lattice sandwich structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, these values exceed those of corrugated plates fabricated using 3D printing (4.92 and 16.96 MPa/(g/cm 3 ), respectively) 39 . Specifically focusing on the specific strength at III density structure, it surpasses the specific strength of pyramidal lattice structures made from continuous carbon fiber‐reinforced composites prepared using continuous fiber three‐dimensional printing, which measures 10.115 MPa/(g/cm 3 ) 28 . It is slightly higher than the specific strength of corrugated aluminum cores produced using conventional technology, which is 13.02 MPa/(g/cm 3 ) 40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Importantly, these values exceed those of corrugated plates fabricated using 3D printing (4.92 and 16.96 MPa/(g/cm 3 ), respectively) 39 . Specifically focusing on the specific strength at III density structure, it surpasses the specific strength of pyramidal lattice structures made from continuous carbon fiber‐reinforced composites prepared using continuous fiber three‐dimensional printing, which measures 10.115 MPa/(g/cm 3 ) 28 . It is slightly higher than the specific strength of corrugated aluminum cores produced using conventional technology, which is 13.02 MPa/(g/cm 3 ) 40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“… FAgoodbreak=ECAlδA, Agoodbreak=italicba, where E C is the compressive modulus of the column, A is the cross‐sectional area of the column, b is the width of the column section, a is the thickness of the column section, and l is the length of the column. The sheer force F S is expressed as follows 28 FSgoodbreak=12ECIl3δS, Igoodbreak=italicba312, where I represents the second‐order moment of the cross‐sectional area of the pillar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different from the traditional manufacturing methods, 3D printing is an ideal method for preparing continuous fiber reinforced composites sandwich panels due to its no mold, excellent geometric design freedoms, and low cost. [15][16][17] So far, some flat sandwich panels of continuous fiber reinforced composite prepared by 3D printing have been reported. Hou et al 18 proposed two design strategies, namely, cross lapping and panel-core lapping, to fabricate the continuous fiber reinforced composite flat corrugated sandwich panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%