Path and effectiveness of municipal waste classification policies: Taking pilot cities in northwest China as an example

ZHANG, Beijia

doi:10.18402/resci.2023.01.08

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This contradiction between high sorting intention and low sorting behavior [5] makes it impossible to form a good model among the residents. According to the survey, multiple factors such as lack of classification knowledge, inertness, and herd mentality have become obstacles for residents to classify garbage, and have also aggravated the difficulty of garbage classification [6]. At the same time, the policy of "instant heat" and the "sort first, mix later" waste management model fails to give positive feedback to urban residents, who do not receive good spiritual guidance and lack the internal driving force to separate waste.…”

Section: Insufficient Consensus Among Residentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solving the Urban Domestic Waste Classification Dilemma from a Coalitional Game Perspective

Li¹,

Liu²,

Wang³

2023

JEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effective classification of urban domestic waste is the key to achieve a "waste-free city" and provides an essential guarantee for resource utilization. This article takes a coalitional game perspective to study the dilemmas in urban domestic waste separation from the cooperative interaction of residents, government, and enterprises. The study finds that urban domestic waste classification in China is currently facing many problems, focusing on: 1) insufficient consensus among residents, 2) shortage of input funds, 3) corporate profitability difficulties, 4) weak policy constraints, and 5) difficulties in integrating goals. In this regard, each participating body still needs to focus on collective interests, coalitional games, break the dilemma society, and promote the long-term management of urban domestic waste.

show abstract

Section: Insufficient Consensus Among Residentsmentioning

confidence: 99%