2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paternity tests in Mexico: Results obtained in 3005 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of repeat gains and losses was relatively balanced (5:9), while four mutations could not be assigned. The average paternal mutation rate estimated across all loci was 0.0016 (95% CI 0.0009-0.0025) per locus per gamete per generation, which is mostly in agreement with previous studies [33,34]. The genotype details of paternity inconsistencies that resulted from mutations in 16 autosomal microsatellite loci studied are described in Table 1 (unpublished data).…”
Section: Astr Typing Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio of repeat gains and losses was relatively balanced (5:9), while four mutations could not be assigned. The average paternal mutation rate estimated across all loci was 0.0016 (95% CI 0.0009-0.0025) per locus per gamete per generation, which is mostly in agreement with previous studies [33,34]. The genotype details of paternity inconsistencies that resulted from mutations in 16 autosomal microsatellite loci studied are described in Table 1 (unpublished data).…”
Section: Astr Typing Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The 16 forensic loci were sufficient to provide positive proof (strong evidence) of paternity, offering high discriminating power in only 15 out of 16 triplet cases, and more genetic information and accurate statistical analyses for achieving confident results are required. According to García-Aceves et al, the implementation of ≥ 20 aSTRs as the routine battery of markers for paternity testing labs allows for obtaining sound conclusions to solve the large majority of motherless cases [33]. In addition, as most DNA-typing applications have legal and ethical implications and there is a particular need for high reliability and high discrimination power in cases where fatherhood cannot be confirmed or ruled out with statistical certainty, the focus should be shifted to the application of alternative and often more discriminative and polymorphic markers [40][41][42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed an overall parentage exclusion rate of 31.16%. The paternity exclusion rate was 32.33 which is comparable to our previous findings 10 but slightly higher than other reported rates 9 , 11 – 13 . This could be because exclusion rates were estimated from cases that arose from doubts regarding biological parenthood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Another previous study performed in populations of Southern, Southeastern and Central Brazilian reported D10S1237 and D19S253 as those with the highest mutation rates, and no mutations in TH01 and TPOX. The most polymorphic loci in our study vWA, D18S51, FGA, and D21S11 presented higher mutation rates in agreement with previous studies .…”
Section: Slippage Mutations Observed In 5171 Paternity Cases From Indsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We confirmed 189 (97.9%) mutations as one‐step and four (2.1%) as two‐step, the latter at locus FGA (22 > 24 or 26 > 24; 27 > 25), CSF1PO (12 > 14), and D13S317 (11 > 9). Higher numbers of slippage mutations were observed in the most polymorphic loci, matching the data presented by other studies .…”
Section: Slippage Mutations Observed In 5171 Paternity Cases From Indsupporting
confidence: 90%