1993
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1993.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paternity displacement in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans

Abstract: Three types of double crosses were carried out to investigate sperm competition in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Maximum likelihood estimation of paternity probability showed a high degree of second male sperm precedence (P2 =90%). The results also showed that: (i) a single copulation may be enough for an efficient paternity displacement; (ii) males do not use sperm plugs, but they mate for a prolonged period of time to resist further copulation; and (iii) successive paternity displacements may be see… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest explanation for the multiple paternity observed in natural populations is the encounter rate theory (Lopez-Leon et al 1993, Daly-Engel et al 2007), which holds that rate of multiple mating should depend on the number of male conspecifics a female encounters over the course of a breeding season. In high density populations, therefore, a female should have more opportunities to encounter males, and the rate of multiple paternity should increase (Kokko & Rankin 2006, Daly-Engel et al 2007).…”
Section: Encounter Rate Theory and Sexual Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest explanation for the multiple paternity observed in natural populations is the encounter rate theory (Lopez-Leon et al 1993, Daly-Engel et al 2007), which holds that rate of multiple mating should depend on the number of male conspecifics a female encounters over the course of a breeding season. In high density populations, therefore, a female should have more opportunities to encounter males, and the rate of multiple paternity should increase (Kokko & Rankin 2006, Daly-Engel et al 2007).…”
Section: Encounter Rate Theory and Sexual Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some spider species, for example, males are unable to determine whether a female has a plug during courtship but fail to successfully copulate when they insert their genitalia (Zimmer et al, ). However, genital plugs can be temporary and can either be ejected during oviposition or simply not persist for long periods (Herberstein et al, ; López‐León et al, ). Instead, males can determine female mating status during copulation based on differences in body size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several explanations as to why males did not exhibit precopulatory choice including that males do not have a reliable precopulatory cue on which to base mate choice or that there is no selection on males to be choosy. The marked difference in copulation duration between mated and unmated females could be attributed to a previous male leaving a physical barrier such as a sperm plug which requires the initiation of copulation to be detected (Herberstein, Wignall, Nessler, Harmer, & Schneider, 2012;López-León, Cabrero, Pardo, Viseras, & Camacho, 1993;Parker, 1970;Zimmer, Schneider, & Herberstein, 2014). In addition, long copulation duration with a previously unmated female might be a form of paternity assurance, for example, mate guarding (Alcock, 1994;Allard, Gobin, & Billen, 2007;Svärd & Wiklund, 1988…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although their effect is certainly not extreme, there is a clear tendency towards a reduction of the number of matings involving individuals with Bs and also delaying the occurrence of the first mating. In a study based on established 19 + 2cr trios of E. plorans, L6pez-Le6n et al (1993) observed a favoured transmission of cytological markers in a second copulation with respect to the first one. Although such analysis was performed to detect paternity displacement, it supports the importance of mating suc- Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%