“…Another factor contributing to the high effective pollination neighbor area ( A ep ) is that H. stigonocarpa has a high level of nectar production per flower; therefore, bats, as the pollinator vector, only need to visit a few flowers per individual before moving on to the next tree, resulting in a wide pollen foraging area. In general, these effective pollination neighbor area ( A ep ) results are higher than the results reported for other tropical trees, such as the moth‐pollinated Cordia alliodora (24.9 ha, Boshier, Chase & Bawa, ), the bee‐pollinated Carapa guianensis (6.36 ha, Cloutier, Kanashiro, Ciampi & Schoen, ), Cariniana legalis (23–37 ha, Tambarussi et al., ), Genipa americana (5.1–11.2 ha, Manoel et al., ) and Swietenia humilis (209 ha, White, Boshier & Powell, ), and the bat‐pollinated Caryocar brasiliense (5.4 ha, Collevatti et al., ) and H. courbaril (169.9 ha, Lacerda et al., ); however, the results are lower than those found for wasp‐pollinated trees, such as Ficus obtusifolia (10,780 ha), Ficus dugandii (63,180 ha), and Ficus popenoei (29,480 ha, Nason & Hamrick, ). The larger effective pollination neighbor area ( A ep ) detected here for H. stigonocarpa than in other studies for C. alliodora , C. legalis , C. guianensis , G. americana , S. humilis , C. brasiliense, and H. courbaril can mainly be explained by the combination of the ability of bats to fly long distances and the large area studied here (2,523 ha).…”