1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91155-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paternal Leucocyte Injections in Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there is no need for treatment before confirmation of pregnancy. (c) If 'blocking' antibodies are the protective agent, they can be made available also for 'nonresponders' to immunization with leukocytes who are considered to have a poor pregnancy outcome [9,10]. (d) HLA immunization which occurs in almost all patients after leukocyte therapy and is potentially hazardous to the mother in case of future blood transfusions or transplantation, can be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there is no need for treatment before confirmation of pregnancy. (c) If 'blocking' antibodies are the protective agent, they can be made available also for 'nonresponders' to immunization with leukocytes who are considered to have a poor pregnancy outcome [9,10]. (d) HLA immunization which occurs in almost all patients after leukocyte therapy and is potentially hazardous to the mother in case of future blood transfusions or transplantation, can be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunization of the mother with paternal lymphocytes has been investigated as a technique to induce immune tolerance. This procedure also known as alloimmunization has been in use since 1970's [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Many groups working in different countries reported positive results of clinical trials, some of which in addition to paternal cell immunization also used third party donor leukocytes, trophoblast membranes, and intravenous immune globulin as a source of alloantigens.…”
Section: To Reject or Not Reject: Alloimmuniza-tion Is The Answermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) The protective principle of IVIG is available immediately after infusion. Hence, there is no need for treatment before confirmation of pregnancy, (c) If "block ing' antibodies are the protective agent, they can be made available also for "nonresponders' to immunization with leukocytes who are considered to have a poor pregnancy outcome [9,10]. (d) HLA immunization which occurs in almost all patients after leukocyte therapy and is potential ly hazardous to the mother in case of future blood trans fusions or transplantation, can be avoided.…”
Section: Side Effects Of Ivig Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported success rates vary between 70 and 100% [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], but its mechanism is not yet fully understood [for review, 11]. According to the prevail ing hypothesis it is assumed that 'blocking' antibodies or factors, normally produced by the mother's immune system to protect the fetus against immunological rejection, are absent in patients with RSA, but can be stimulated by transfusion/vaccination with allogeneic leukocytes [1,3,4,[6][7][8][9]11], The formation of lymphocytotoxic and/or noncytotoxic antibodies which inhibit Fc-rosette formation [12,13], immune phagocytosis [13,14] or mixed lymphocyte culture [4,6,8,15] is considered to be an indicator of effective immunization after leukocyte therapy and of a successful outcome of pregnancy [9,10]. Hence, we hy pothesize that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) pro cessed from a large pool of donors should contain pre formed antibodies of similar specificity and therefore might be effective by 'passive immunization' in patients with RSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%