2013
DOI: 10.1111/1756-2171.12035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent pools and innovation in substitute technologies—evidence from the 19th‐century sewing machine industry

Abstract: Patent pools, which combine complementary patents of competing firms, are expected to increase overall welfare but potentially discourage innovation in substitutes for the pool technology. This article exploits a new historical data set on changes in patenting and firm entry for a clearly defined pool technology and substitutes in the 19th‐century sewing machine industry. This analysis reveals a substantial increase in innovation for an—albeit technologically inferior—substitute technology. Historical evidence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here I discuss the most important differences, while further details the case of gins, it is reasonable to expect innovation to respond to changing conditions within a one to three year time frame. Another piece of evidence from the same time period comes from Lampe and Moser (2013). They found evidence that the introduction of a patent pool in the sewing machine industry led to an increase in patents of substitute inventions that spiked one to three years after the pool began.…”
Section: Sources Of Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here I discuss the most important differences, while further details the case of gins, it is reasonable to expect innovation to respond to changing conditions within a one to three year time frame. Another piece of evidence from the same time period comes from Lampe and Moser (2013). They found evidence that the introduction of a patent pool in the sewing machine industry led to an increase in patents of substitute inventions that spiked one to three years after the pool began.…”
Section: Sources Of Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A companion study of pools that formed across a broad range of 20 industries in the 1930s, however, unambiguously confirms the decline in patenting (Lampe and Moser 2014). In the absence of effective antitrust, dominant firms used a pool to further limit and discourage competition by outside firms.…”
Section: Similar To Today Litigation Risks Were Extremely Damagingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Data on patents and firm entry indicate that the creation of a patent pool diverted innovation away from the pool technology towards a substitute technology that was already understood to be inferior (Lampe and Moser 2014). As long as the pool created a significant wedge between license fees for members and outsiders, outsiders entered with the substitute because they needed to avoid licensing and litigation.…”
Section: Similar To Today Litigation Risks Were Extremely Damagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The empirical evidence on the effects of patent pools on firms’ innovative activities in ICTs is mixed. Historical evidence is in Lampe and Moser (, ). The authors investigate the effects of patent pools on innovation incentives looking at the sewing machine industry in the late 19th century.…”
Section: Patent Poolsmentioning
confidence: 99%