1992
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(92)90007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent infections of Ascaris suum in pigs: Effect of previous exposure to multiple, high doses of eggs and various treatment regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have demonstrated development of protective immunity, as demonstrated by reduced larval recovery after challenge inoculation, there is no evidence to sustain the idea that pigs are thereby protected from acquisition of patent infections. In contrast, Stankiewicz et al . (1992) showed development of patent infections in all pigs that had previously been immunized with eggs and subsequently treated with an anthelmintic before a single challenge inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although we have demonstrated development of protective immunity, as demonstrated by reduced larval recovery after challenge inoculation, there is no evidence to sustain the idea that pigs are thereby protected from acquisition of patent infections. In contrast, Stankiewicz et al . (1992) showed development of patent infections in all pigs that had previously been immunized with eggs and subsequently treated with an anthelmintic before a single challenge inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Neonatal exposure to A. suum may reduce the immune response to the parasite (e.g. Stankiewicz et al 1992;Stankiewicz and Froe 1995) and result in higher worm burdens (Mejer and Roepstorff 2006a), than observed when pigs are infected at 8-10 weeks of age, when the piglets have a more developed immune system (Eriksen et al 1992). Further, chronic infections with large 'life time worm burdens' increase production losses (Bernardo et al 1990).…”
Section: Egg Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that A. suum can cause production losses in relation to the magnitude of the lifetime worm burden (Bernardo et al 1990). Thus, for organic husbandry, it is of importance that neonatal exposure to A. suum may result in high persistent worm numbers (Stankiewicz et al 1992;Mejer and Roepstorff 2006a) and Trichuris suis (whipworm) may cause bloodstained diarrhoea and even death, when young pigs are heavily exposed (Powers et al 1960;Jensen and Svensmark 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason may be that neonatal exposure to A. suum may either heighten susceptibility or induce tolerance to the infection in the exposed pigs (Kelley and Nayak, 1964 ;Stankiewicz et al 1992 ;Stankiewicz and Froe, 1995), resulting in long-term persistence of relatively high numbers of adult worms. However, recent work has shown that very high natural exposure may result in expulsion of intestinal A. suum before 7 weeks p.p., indicating a dose-dependent response to trickle infections even in piglets (Roepstorff, unpublished).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above-mentioned studies have all used weaned pigs (approx. 10 weeks of age), and work by Stankiewicz et al (1992) indicates that neonatal exposure to A. suum may alter the infection dynamics by increasing susceptibility or tolerance to infection. Organic production systems with outdoor farrowing facilities provide suitable conditions for transmission of A. suum (Roepstorff and Nansen, 1994) and 10 to 12-week-old pigs have been shown to excrete high numbers of A. suum eggs, indicating that the pigs were exposed within a few weeks after being born (Roepstorff et al 1992 ;Carstensen et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%