2017
DOI: 10.1159/000484247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent Foramen Ovale as Possible Cause of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case Report

Abstract: Objective: To present a case of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and the related diagnostic workup. Clinical Presentation and Intervention: A 54-year-old man presented with a unilateral SSNHL episode and vertigo. A severe patent foramen ovale (PFO) that included a complete ear nose and throat, audiological, and neurological examination was discovered during the diagnostic workup. Audiometry, blood, and serological tests were performed. Magnetic resonance imaging and color Doppler echography of the sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 5 out of 10 patients developed audiovestibulopathy with concurrent embolic infarctions in the supratentorial areas. Only recently, sudden sensorineural hearing loss was described in a patient with patent foramen ovale ( 25 ). Even though combined vertigo and hearing loss is the most common presentation of labyrinthine infarction ( 7 ), the vestibular symptoms frequently take central stages and patients may not report hearing loss unless specifically inquired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, 5 out of 10 patients developed audiovestibulopathy with concurrent embolic infarctions in the supratentorial areas. Only recently, sudden sensorineural hearing loss was described in a patient with patent foramen ovale ( 25 ). Even though combined vertigo and hearing loss is the most common presentation of labyrinthine infarction ( 7 ), the vestibular symptoms frequently take central stages and patients may not report hearing loss unless specifically inquired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%