2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patellofemoral joint kinetics during squatting in collegiate women athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
57
3
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
57
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak PFJRF also was significantly greater during the FSD (51.1  2.7 N/kg) compared to the LSU (44.1  3.4 N/kg; P<.001) and FSU (43.6  2.3 N/kg; P = .023) exercises. Although studies have quantified patellofemoral joint force and stress during various rehabilitation exercises (eg, leg press, squatting, lunging), [14][15][16]34,35,40 the influence of various stepping exercises on patellofemoral joint kinetics has not been described. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to characterize PFJRF and PFJS during FSU, LSU, and FSD exercises in healthy individuals.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak PFJRF also was significantly greater during the FSD (51.1  2.7 N/kg) compared to the LSU (44.1  3.4 N/kg; P<.001) and FSU (43.6  2.3 N/kg; P = .023) exercises. Although studies have quantified patellofemoral joint force and stress during various rehabilitation exercises (eg, leg press, squatting, lunging), [14][15][16]34,35,40 the influence of various stepping exercises on patellofemoral joint kinetics has not been described. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to characterize PFJRF and PFJS during FSU, LSU, and FSD exercises in healthy individuals.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with patellofemoral joint force and stress data during the barbell squat from Escamilla et al 12 and Salem and Powers. 25 Escamilla et al 12 reported that patellofemoral joint forces increased until 75° to 80° knee flexion, and then began to plateau or slightly decrease. Salem and Powers 25 reported no significant differences in patellofemoral joint force or stress at 75°, 100°, and 110° knee flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Escamilla et al 12 reported that patellofemoral joint forces increased until 75° to 80° knee flexion, and then began to plateau or slightly decrease. Salem and Powers 25 reported no significant differences in patellofemoral joint force or stress at 75°, 100°, and 110° knee flexion. Therefore, injury risk to the patellofemoral joint may not increase with knee angles between 75° to 110° due to similar magnitudes in patellofemoral joint stress during these knee angles, with the benefit of increased quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius activity when training at higher knee angles (75°-110°) compared to lower knee angles (0°-70°).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This syndrome is fairly common, and its prevalence is about 25% of the population, with young adults being the most affected [3]. This syndrome is seen to affect both the sexes, but its prevalence is higher in the case of women [4,5]. Studies have shown the high prevalence of this syndrome in runners and athletes who perform jumping movements [3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This syndrome is seen to affect both the sexes, but its prevalence is higher in the case of women [4,5]. Studies have shown the high prevalence of this syndrome in runners and athletes who perform jumping movements [3,5]. Although there are no confirmed signs and symptoms to diagnose the syndrome, the patients typically suffer from pain in the anterior of the knee due to compression of the patellofemoral joint, which is felt around the patella while performing any sort of physical or sport activity [1,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%