1998
DOI: 10.3109/17453679808997784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patellar alignment evaluated by MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in the femoral sulcus angle corresponded to a shallower articular surface whereas a decrease in this angle corresponded to a deeper articular surface. Both the lateral condyle-patella angle and femoral sulcus angle were measured at mid-patella level [21], determined by counting all the slices that go through the patella and using the middle slice. In the case when there is an even number of slices, the two middle slices are measured and averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the femoral sulcus angle corresponded to a shallower articular surface whereas a decrease in this angle corresponded to a deeper articular surface. Both the lateral condyle-patella angle and femoral sulcus angle were measured at mid-patella level [21], determined by counting all the slices that go through the patella and using the middle slice. In the case when there is an even number of slices, the two middle slices are measured and averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few studies have evaluated PF alignment by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [19-21]. Muellner and colleagues [19] performed measurements analogous to those used in X-ray evaluation with MRI images obtained with knees flexed to 20° and 45°.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muellner and colleagues [19] performed measurements analogous to those used in X-ray evaluation with MRI images obtained with knees flexed to 20° and 45°. Knee flexion allows the evaluation of PF relations when the patella is located in opposition to the femoral trochanteric sulcus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] First, the bony contour takes the place of the actual articular surface because articular cartilage cannot be seen by plain radiography or CT. [13][14][15] Secondly, since the midpatellar axial plane is commonly chosen as the cross-sectional plane for evaluation of the trochlea, this location may differ from patient to patient where there are individual differences in the location of the patella in relation to the femur. 7,13,16 Finally, it is difficult to accurately reconstruct the shape of the trochlea from consecutive two dimensional (2D) images alone. 9,13 In an attempt to compensate for these limitations, basic biomechanical studies have directly analysed the shape of the trochlea using cadavers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,13,16 Finally, it is difficult to accurately reconstruct the shape of the trochlea from consecutive two dimensional (2D) images alone. 9,13 In an attempt to compensate for these limitations, basic biomechanical studies have directly analysed the shape of the trochlea using cadavers. This has provided important basic data which are used in the design of prosthetic joints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%