2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.15.484539
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch2Self denoising of Diffusion MRI with Self-Supervision and Matrix Sketching

Abstract: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is the only noninvasive method for quantifying microstructure and reconstructing white-matter pathways in the living human brain. Fluctuations from multiple sources create significant additive noise in DWI data which must be suppressed before subsequent microstructure analysis. We introduce a self-supervised learning method for denoising DWI data, Patch2Self (P2S), which uses the entire volume to learn a full-rank locally linear denoiser for that volume. By t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2A where different denoisers are compared via RTOP and FA. Multi-ONLM is known to cause spatial smoothing whereas MPPCA and Patch2Self do not [6] (see supplement for a comparison). One can see qualitatively (via NUQ quality maps) and quantitatively (via NUQ scores) that for the case of RTOP on the CFIN data and FA on the LA5c data, despite smoothing the signal, Multi-ONLM has a higher uncertainty as compared to MPPCA and Patch2Self.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2A where different denoisers are compared via RTOP and FA. Multi-ONLM is known to cause spatial smoothing whereas MPPCA and Patch2Self do not [6] (see supplement for a comparison). One can see qualitatively (via NUQ quality maps) and quantitatively (via NUQ scores) that for the case of RTOP on the CFIN data and FA on the LA5c data, despite smoothing the signal, Multi-ONLM has a higher uncertainty as compared to MPPCA and Patch2Self.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is then used to infer the underlying (sub-voxel resolution) tissue microstructure. Due to the inherent noise in the acquired signal, this ill-posed inverse problem leads to fitting degeneracies and unreliable estimates of the underlying cellular organization [6]. These errors propagate and amplify the uncertainty in downstream tasks such as tractography and group-level analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More and more unsupervised learning based denoising methods [1,6,10,13] have been proposed and achieves promising performance. However, these approaches are not intended to correct structural noise.…”
Section: General Denoising Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dipy (Garyfallidis et al, 2014) was used to denoise the raw images using patch2self (Fadnavis et al, 2020), a self-supervised algorithm that learns to separate signal from noise without model assumptions using oversampled data. MRtrix3 (Tournier et al, 2019) was used to reduce Gibbs ringing artefacts with a sub-voxel shift algorithm (Kellner et al, 2016) and to correct for distortions induced by motion, susceptibility, and eddy currents using FSL's topup and eddy (Andersson and Sotiropoulos, 2016;Smith et al, 2004).…”
Section: Image Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%